The Associated General Contractors of America, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
  2. American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B

    193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 38 times
    In American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wine, Liquor, U

    178 F.2d 584 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 24 times

    No. 29, Docket 2137-1. Argued November 7, 1949. Decided December 12, 1949. Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Reeves R. Hilton, Dominick L. Manoli and Albert Dreyer, Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board, Reeves R. Hilton, Washington, D.C., counsel. Cohen Burlakoff, New York City, Arnold Cohen, New York City, for respondent, Joseph E. Brill and Harold Krieger, New York City, on the brief. Before

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pinkerton's

    202 F.2d 230 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 20 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Pinkerton's National Detective Agency, 202 F.2d 230 (9th Cir. 1953), a court of appeals decision rendered shortly before the oral argument in that case made a type of contract lawful which the Board had found to be unlawful.
  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. United BHD

    184 F.2d 60 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times

    No. 3969. August 14, 1950. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, and A. Norman Somers, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Clif. Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo. (John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. In presently pertinent part, section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, as amended by the Labor-Management

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Potlatch Forests

    189 F.2d 82 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 12532. May 11, 1951. Rehearing Denied July 6, 1951. Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Albert M. Dreyer, Maurice Alexandre, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington D.C., for petitioner. R.N. Elder, Robt. H. Elder, Sidney E. Smith, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, George W. Beardmore, Lewiston, Idaho, for respondent. Before ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges, and FEE, District Judge. ORR, Circuit Judge. National Labor Relations

  7. Joliet Con. Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    193 F.2d 833 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 12 times

    No. 10323. January 7, 1952. Charles M. Price, Harold D. Burgess, Charles B. Mahin, Willard C. Meier, and Leish, Spray, Price Underwood, all of Chicago, Ill., for petitioners. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, George J. Bott, General Counsel, Alice Andrews, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Daniel D. Carmell, and Asher, Gubbins Segall, and Lester Asher, all of Chicago, Ill., for amici curiae

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Indiana Desk Co.

    149 F.2d 987 (7th Cir. 1945)   Cited 16 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Indiana Desk Co., 149 F.2d 987, 995, this court said, where a similar situation was involved: "The undisputed evidence discloses that the picketing was not conducted for the purpose of publicizing the strike or any grievance which the strikers had against respondent, or for the purpose of persuading the non-strikers to join the strikers or to refrain from going to work during the strike.
  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Del E. Webb Const

    196 F.2d 702 (8th Cir. 1952)   Cited 4 times

    No. 14491. May 8, 1952. Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Mark C. Curran, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles B. Blackmar, Kansas City, Mo. (Henry I. Eager, Robert W. Dammann, and Blackmar, Newkirk, Eager, Swanson Midgley, all of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondent Del E. Webb Const. Co. John J. Manning,

  10. French v. Hall

    119 U.S. 152 (1886)   Cited 26 times
    In French v. Hall, 1886, 119 U.S. 152, 7 S.Ct. 170, 30 L.Ed. 375, a case was tried for the second time. During cross examination on the stand, defendant testified that he had never told plaintiff's attorney, one Carpenter, that he promised to pay $5000.