The American League of Professional Baseball Clubs

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.

    394 U.S. 759 (1969)   Cited 809 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication
  2. U.S. v. Underwriters Assn

    322 U.S. 533 (1944)   Cited 628 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding the antitrust laws applicable to the business of insurance
  3. Toolson v. New York Yankees

    346 U.S. 356 (1953)   Cited 106 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc., 346 U.S. 356, 357, we refused to re-examine a prior decision holding baseball not to be covered by the antitrust laws, stating that "[t]he business has thus been left for thirty years to develop, on the understanding that it was not subject to existing antitrust legislation."
  4. U.S. v. International Boxing Club

    348 U.S. 236 (1955)   Cited 70 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Refusing to extend "baseball" exemption to boxing
  5. United States v. Shubert

    348 U.S. 222 (1955)   Cited 62 times
    Finding that business built around the performance of local theatrical productions is subject to antitrust laws
  6. Federal Club v. National League

    259 U.S. 200 (1922)   Cited 136 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the business of providing public baseball games for profit between clubs of professional baseball players was not within the scope of federal antitrust laws
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"
  8. Musicians Union, Local No. 6 v. Superior Court

    69 Cal.2d 695 (Cal. 1968)   Cited 13 times

    Docket No. S.F. 22609. November 26, 1968. PROCEEDING in prohibition to restrain the Superior Court of Alameda County from further proceeding with an action to enjoin a labor union from picketing a baseball stadium. Alternative writ discharged; peremptory writ granted. Neyhart, Grodin Beeson, Joseph R. Grodin, Duane Beeson, Levy, De Roy, Geffner Van Bourg and Victor J. Van Bourg for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Stark, Simon Sparrowe, Merrill J. Schwartz, Hagar, Crosby Rosson, Raoul D

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Harrah's Club

    362 F.2d 425 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times
    In NLRB v. Harrah's Club, 362 F.2d 425 (9th Cir. 1966), this court upheld the Board's exercise of jurisdiction over a Nevada gambling casino, notwithstanding the Board's established policy of not invoking its jurisdiction over racetracks.