Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

Denver Stock Yard v. Livestock Assn

In Denver Union the Supreme Court held that for purposes of § 304 of the Act, 7 U.S.C.A. § 205, which imposes on a market agency duties of reasonableness and non-discrimination in the furnishing of services, the phrase "at such stockyards" (defining the places where the duties applied) means every stockyard at which the agency was registered.

Fay v. Douds

Suggesting that district court jurisdiction is appropriate whenever a party in a labor dispute asserts non-frivolous claims of a constitutional violation

N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.

In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.

Harvey Aluminum

In Harvey Aluminum, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a complaint charging that the petitioners engaged in unfair labor practice by maintaining surveillance of union activities of employees of Harvey Aluminum, Inc. ("Harvey") and General Engineering, Inc. ("General").

Singer Sewing Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

Finding misconduct where there was prima facie evidence that agency violated statute previously construed by multiple courts of appeals (citing Overnite Transp. Co. v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1963))

N.L.R.B. v. Quaker City Life Insurance Company

In NLRB v. Quaker City Life Insurance Co., 319 F.2d 690 (4th Cir. 1963), we held that the secretary of the district manager of a national insurance company was a confidential employee and that "[i]t would be patently unfair to require the company to bargain with a union that contain[ed] such an employee."

N.L.R.B. v. Clearfield Cheese Company

In NLRB v. Clearfield Cheese Co., 322 F.2d 89 (3d Cir. 1963), for example, the court enforced a bargaining order of the Labor Board based upon findings that a speech and a letter from the employer to his employees conveying a threat that the employer would go out of business if the union prevailed in the election had robbed the employees of free choice.

Olson Rug Company v. National Labor Rel. Board

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"