§

Television Broadcasters, Inc.

152 N.L.R.B. 1237 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Television Broadcasters, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Electric Steam Radiator Corp.

    321 F.2d 733 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 28 times
    Containing similar language

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Great E. Color Lithographic Corp.

    309 F.2d 352 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 21 times

    No. 53, Docket 27470. Argued October 19, 1962. Decided November 1, 1962. A. Brummel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Melvin Pollack, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. James E. Birdsall of Warner Birdsall, New York City, for respondent. Before WATERMAN, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  4. Local No. 152 v. N.L.R.B

    343 F.2d 307 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 13 times
    In Local No. 152 there was evidence (1) that the union honestly but mistakenly believed it represented a majority of the employees in the unit when it sought recognition, and one week thereafter actually attained majority status, (2) the company responded that it was not interested in talking to the union, (3) the company did not in any manner dispute the union's claim of majority representation, (4) the company ignored the union's demand for recognition, and (5) the union petitioned the Board for an election.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Texas Indep. Oil

    232 F.2d 447 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 16 times

    No. 14680. April 18, 1956. Rehearing Denied June 20, 1956. Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Edmond Wilson, Samuel M. Singer, James A. Ryan, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Langmade Sullivan, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, FEE, and CHAMBERS, Circuit Judges. STEPHENS, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order of

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Plastic Prod

    175 F.2d 755 (4th Cir. 1949)   Cited 15 times

    No. 5868. Argued April 6, 1949. Decided June 1, 1949. Rehearing Denied July 5, 1949. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding on the petition of National Labor Relations Board against the National Plastic Products Company for enforcement of an order of the board directing respondent to bargain with the International Chemical Workers Union and to cease and desist from interfering with its employees in their efforts at self organization. Order enforced

  7. Wells, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    162 F.2d 457 (9th Cir. 1947)   Cited 12 times

    No. 11388. June 17, 1947. Petition for Review, and Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by Wells, Incorporated to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board consolidated with a proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce order against Wells Incorporated. Order modified and enforcement decree granted. Louis H. Callister, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for petitioner. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, Associate

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sunnyland Packing

    211 F.2d 923 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 2 times

    No. 14823. April 22, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Robert H. Hurt, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Waldo DeLoache, Gibson DeLoache, Moultrie, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. What and all that is in question in this proceeding for approval of the Board's decision and enforcement of its order is whether

  9. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    138 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 8 times

    No. 8054. Argued November 2, 1942. Decided September 7, 1943. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 25, 1943. On petition to Review the Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings by the National Labor Relations Board against the Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Company for disestablishment of the Budd Employee Representation Association, which intervened, and reinstatement of two discharged employees of the company. On the company's petition to review the Board's order requiring disestablishment

  10. Onan v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    139 F.2d 728 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 7 times

    No. 12642. January 6, 1944. On Petition for Review of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by David W. Onan and others, general partners in a limited partnership, doing business as D.W. Onan Sons, to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and request by the Board for enforcement of the order. Petition for review denied, and petition for enforcement granted. R.H. Fryberger, of Minneapolis, Minn., for petitioners. William J. Isaacson, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations