§

T.E. Briggs Construction Co.

349 N.L.R.B. 671 (N.L.R.B. 2007)
T.E. Briggs Construction Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  3. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  4. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. FES

    301 F.3d 83 (3d Cir. 2002)   Cited 49 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding issue not exhausted where the "tenor" of petitioner's objection to the Board was "purely factual," but the tenor of the objection on appeal was legal

  6. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  7. Sever v. N.L.R.B

    231 F.3d 1156 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that argument is waived where employee did not raise it in its exceptions to ALJ's decision

  8. Little Rock Airmotive, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    455 F.2d 163 (8th Cir. 1972)   Cited 10 times

    No. 20350. February 9, 1972. Charles J. Lincoln, Philip K. Lyon, Little Rock, Ark., for petitioner; House, Holmes Jewell, Little Rock, Ark., of counsel. Charles N. Steele, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, BRIGHT, Circuit Judge, and WEBSTER, District Judge. Eastern District