Syracuse Scenery & Stage Lighting Co.
9 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Windward Partners v. Ariyoshi
461 U.S. 906 (1983) Cited 64 times 2 Legal AnalysesNo. 82-1529. April 25, 1983, October TERM, 1982. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 693 F. 2d 928.
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Katz's Deli
80 F.3d 755 (2d Cir. 1996) Cited 57 timesFinding employer's challenge premature because compliance proceeding had not yet occurred
N.L.R.B. v. American Geri-Care, Inc.
697 F.2d 56 (2d Cir. 1982) Cited 69 timesHolding that an inference of anti-union animus is “proper when the timing of the employer's actions is ‘stunningly obvious' ”
Power Inc. v. N.L.R.B
40 F.3d 409 (D.C. Cir. 1994) Cited 26 timesHolding that coincident timing and uncontested § 8 violations was sufficient evidence to support Board's finding
Laro Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
56 F.3d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1995) Cited 23 timesInferring discriminatory motive from, inter alia, an employer's professed desire to hire the best qualified workers and the employer's subsequent decision to hire employees with no relevant experience over union members with experience
Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 56 timesUpholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
Wyman-Gordon Co. v. N.L.R.B
654 F.2d 134 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 20 timesFinding statement that "bargaining would 'begin at zero' and work up" constituted a violation of § 8
Majestic Molded Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
330 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 26 timesIn Majestic Molded Products, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., (2 Cir. 1964) 330 F.2d 603, 606, the layoffs were also in order of seniority.