§

Sundance Construction Co.

325 N.L.R.B. 1013 (N.L.R.B. 1998)
Sundance Construction Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. N.L.R.B. v. McCullough Environmental Serv

    5 F.3d 923 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 98 times
    Concluding that statement that "things were going to get a lot tougher around here" upon unionization constituted a threat

  4. Frosty Morn Meats, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    296 F.2d 617 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 33 times
    Moving cause

  5. International Un. of Oper. Eng., v. N.L.R.B

    353 F.2d 852 (D.C. Cir. 1965)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 19238. Argued September 21, 1965. Decided November 4, 1965. Mr. Ronald A. Jacks, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Mr. Michael R. Brown, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Solomon I. Hirsh, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on the

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Davidson Rubber Company

    305 F.2d 166 (1st Cir. 1962)   Cited 2 times

    No. 5948. July 13, 1962. James C. Paras, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Robert Sewell, Attorney, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement