Stockbridge Country Manor

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jun 30, 2008

352 N.L.R.B. 857 (N.L.R.B. 2008)

STOCKBRIDGE COUNTRY MANOR
352 NLRB No. 104
857
Convalcare Corp. d/b/a Stockbridge Country Manor
and SEIU Healthcare Michigan. Case 7–CA–
51070
June 30, 2008
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN SCHAUMBER AND MEMBER LIEBMAN
The General Counsel seeks a default judgment in this
case on the ground that the Respondent has failed to file
an answer to the complaint and compliance specification.
Upon a charge filed by the Union on February 19, 2008,
the General Counsel issued the complaint and compli-
ance specification on April 25, 2008, against Convalcare
Corp. d/b/a Stockbridge Country Manor, the Respondent,
alleging that it had violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the
Act. The Respondent failed to file an answer.
On June 4, 2008, the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Default Judgment with the Board. Thereafter, on
June 9, 2008, the Board issued an order transferring the
proceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause
why the motion should not be granted. The Respondent
filed no response. The allegations in the motion are
therefore undisputed.
Ruling on Motion for Default Judgment1
Section 102.20 of the Board’s Rules and Regulations
provides that the allegations in the complaint shall be
deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days
from service of the complaint, unless good cause is
shown. Similarly, Section 102.56 of the Board’s Rules
and Regulations provides that the allegations in a com-
pliance specification will be taken as true if an answer is
not filed within 21 days from service of the compliance
specification. In addition, the complaint and compliance
specification affirmatively stated that unless an answer
was filed on or before May 9, 2008, the Board could find
all the allegations in the complaint and compliance speci-
fication are true. Further, the undisputed allegations in
the General Counsel’s motion disclose that the Region,
by letter dated May 16, 2008, notified the Respondent
that unless an answer was received by May 23, 2008, a
motion for default judgment would be filed. Neverthe-
less, the Respondent failed to file an answer.

1 Effective midnight December 28, 2007, Members Liebman,
Schaumber, Kirsanow, and Walsh delegated to Members Liebman,
Schaumber, and Kirsanow, as a three-member group, all of the Board’s
powers in anticipation of the expiration of the terms of Members Kir-
sanow and Walsh on December 31, 2007. Pursuant to this delegation,
Chairman Schaumber and Member Liebman constitute a quorum of the
three-member group. As a quorum, they have the authority to issue
decisions and orders in unfair labor practice and representation cases.
See Sec. 3(b) of the Act.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun-
sel’s Motion for Default Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a corporation
with an office and facility in Stockbridge, Michigan, has
been engaged in the operation of a nursing home. Dur-
ing 2007, a representative period, the Respondent, in
conducting its operations described above, derived gross
revenue in excess of $100,000 and purchased and re-
ceived at its Stockbridge facility goods and materials
valued in excess of $50,000 directly from points outside
the State of Michigan.
We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged
in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act, and a health care institution within the
meaning of Section 2(14) of the Act and that the Union,
SEIU Healthcare Michigan (formerly known as Local 79,
Service Employees International Union), is a labor or-
ganization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
At all material times, the following individuals held
the positions set forth opposite their names and have
been supervisors of the Respondent within the meaning
of Section 2(11) of the Act and agents of the Respondent
within the meaning of Section 2(13) of the Act:
Paul Himelhoch Owner/Administrator
Deborah Joseph Office Manager/Business Manager
The following employees of the Respondent, the unit,
constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec-
tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the
Act:
All regular full-time and regular part-time nurse assis-
tants, CENAs, bath and rehab aides, cooks dietary
aides, laundry and housekeeping aides, and mainte-
nance employees employed by the Respondent at its
facility located at 406 West Main Street, Stockbridge,
Michigan; but excluding the administrator, office man-
ager, activity director, social worker, director of nurs-
ing, charge nurses, dietary supervisor, housekeeping
supervisor, laundry supervisor, maintenance supervi-
sors, probationary employees, and all other employees
such as nurses, activity aides, office employees/staff,
ward clerks, all other supervisors and guards as defined
in the Act.
At all material times, the Union has been the desig-
nated exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD858
the unit and has been recognized as such representative
by the Respondent. This recognition has been embodied
in successive collective-bargaining agreements, the most
recent of which was effective by its terms for the period
from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2003,
which agreement was extended on an annual basis by the
Respondent and the Union or its predecessor.
At all material times, based on Section 9(a) of the Act,
the Union has been the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the unit. On about October 1, 2007, the
Respondent and the Union reached an agreement on
terms and conditions of employment of the unit to be
incorporated in a collective-bargaining agreement effec-
tive from October 1, 2007, through September 30, 2010.
Since about October 1, 2007, the Respondent unilater-
ally failed to pay contractual wage raises to unit employ-
ees. Since about January 1, 2008, the Respondent unilat-
erally failed to pay vacation pay to unit employees.
On about February 19, 2008, the Respondent perma-
nently closed its facility and terminated the employment
of all employees in the unit.
Since about January 16, 2008, and continuing to date,
the Respondent has failed and refused to provide the Un-
ion with a meaningful opportunity to bargain over the
effects of the closing of its facility on the unit.
The subjects set forth above relate to wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment of the unit and
are mandatory subjects for the purposes of collective
bargaining.
The Respondent engaged in the conduct set forth
above without affording the Union notice and a meaning-
ful opportunity to bargain about these changes and their
effects on the unit.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon-
dent has failed and refused to bargain collectively and in
good faith with the exclusive collective-bargaining repre-
sentative of its employees in violation of Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) of the Act. The Respondent’s unfair labor prac-
tices affect commerce within the meaning of and Section
2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent violated Section 8(a)(5) and
(1) of the Act by failing to pay contractual wage raises to
unit employees since October 1, 2007, and by failing to
pay vacation pay to unit employees since January 1,
2008, we shall order the Respondent to make unit em-
ployees whole by paying them the amounts set forth in
the compliance specification, plus interest accrued to the
date of payment as set forth in New Horizons for the Re-
tarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987), and minus tax withhold-
ings required by Federal and State laws.2
To remedy the Respondent’s unlawful failure and re-
fusal to bargain with the Union about the effects of its
decision to permanently close its Stockbridge, Michigan
facility, we shall order the Respondent to bargain with
the Union, on request, about the effects of its decision.
As a result of the Respondent’s unlawful conduct, how-
ever, the unit employees have been denied an opportu-
nity to bargain through their collective-bargaining repre-
sentative at a time when the Respondent might still have
been in need of their services and a measure of balanced
bargaining power existed. Meaningful bargaining cannot
be assured until some measure of economic strength is
restored to the Union. A bargaining order alone, there-
fore, cannot serve as an adequate remedy for the unfair
labor practices committed.
Accordingly, we deem it necessary, in order to ensure
that meaningful bargaining occurs and to effectuate the
policies of the Act, to accompany our bargaining order
with a limited backpay requirement designed both to
make whole the employees for losses suffered as a result
of the violations and to re-create in some practicable
manner a situation in which the parties’ bargaining posi-
tion is not entirely devoid of economic consequences for
the Respondent. We shall do so by ordering the Respon-
dent to pay backpay to the unit employees in a manner
similar to that required in Transmarine Navigation
Corp., 170 NLRB 389 (1968), as clarified by Melody
Toyota, 325 NLRB 846 (1998).
Pursuant to Transmarine, the Respondent typically
would be required to pay its unit employees backpay at
the rate of their normal wages when last in the Respon-
dent’s employ from 5 days after the date of this Decision
and Order until the occurrence of the earliest of the fol-
lowing conditions: (1) the date the Respondent bargains
to agreement with the Union on those subjects pertaining
to the effects of closing its facility on its employees; (2) a
bona fide impasse in bargaining; (3) the Union’s failure
to request bargaining within 5 business days after receipt
of this Decision and Order, or to commence negotiations
within 5 business days after receipt of the Respondent’s

2 In the complaint, the General Counsel seeks “interest calculated on
a quarterly compound basis” for any monetary amounts owing to the
employees. Having duly considered the matter, we are not prepared at
this time to deviate from our current practice of assessing simple inter-
est. See, e.g., Rogers Corp., 344 NLRB 504 (2005).
STOCKBRIDGE COUNTRY MANOR 859
notice of its desire to bargain with the Union; or (4) the
Union’s subsequent failure to bargain in good faith.
Transmarine provides that the sum paid to these unit
employees may not exceed the amount they would have
earned as wages from the date on which the Respondent
ceased doing business at the facility to the time they se-
cured equivalent employment elsewhere, or the date on
which the Respondent shall have offered to bargain in
good faith, whichever occurs sooner. However, Trans-
marine further provides that in no event shall this sum be
less than the unit employees would have earned for a 2-
week period at the rate of their normal wages when last
in the Respondent’s employ. Backpay is typically based
on earnings which the unit employees would normally
have received during the applicable period, less any net
interim earnings, and is computed in accordance with F.
W. Woolworth Co., 90 NLRB 289 (1950), with interest
as prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, supra.
Here, in the circumstances of the Respondent’s cessa-
tion of operations, the General Counsel in the compli-
ance specification seeks only the minimum 2 weeks of
backpay due the terminated employees under Transma-
rine. Schedules A through D of the complaint and com-
pliance specification set forth the amount due each em-
ployee. We shall grant the General Counsel’s request
and order the Respondent to pay those amounts to the
discriminatees, plus interest accrued to the date of pay-
ment.
Further, in view of the fact that the Respondent’s facil-
ity is closed, we shall order the Respondent to mail a
copy of the attached notice to the Union and to the last
known addresses of its former unit employees in order to
inform them of the outcome of this proceeding.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Convalcare Corp. d/b/a Stockbridge Coun-
try Manor, Stockbridge, Michigan, its officers, agents,
successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to bargain collectively and in
good faith with SEIU Healthcare Michigan as the exclu-
sive collective-bargaining representative of the employ-
ees in the unit by unilaterally failing to pay contractual
wage raises to unit employees; failing to pay vacation
pay to unit employees; and failing to provide the Union
with a meaningful opportunity to bargain over the effects
of its decision to permanently close its Stockbridge,
Michigan facility and terminate the employees in the
unit. The appropriate unit is:
All regular full-time and regular part-time nurse assis-
tants, CENAs, bath and rehab aides, cooks dietary
aides, laundry and housekeeping aides, and mainte-
nance employees employed by the Respondent at its
facility located at 406 West Main Street, Stockbridge,
Michigan; but excluding the administrator, office man-
ager, activity director, social worker, director of nurs-
ing, charge nurses, dietary supervisor, housekeeping
supervisor, laundry supervisor, maintenance supervi-
sors, probationary employees, and all other employees
such as nurses, activity aides, office employees/staff,
ward clerks, all other supervisors and guards as defined
in the Act.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) On request, bargain with the Union concerning the
effects on the unit employees of the Respondent’s deci-
sion to permanently close its Stockbridge, Michigan fa-
cility, and reduce to writing and sign any agreement
reached as a result of such bargaining.
(b) Make the unit employees whole for any loss of
earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of the
Respondent’s failure to pay contractual wage raises, and
vacation pay to unit employees, and for its failure to bar-
gain with the Union concerning the effects on unit em-
ployees of its decision to permanently close its Stock-
bridge, Michigan facility, by paying them the backpay
amounts following their names, plus interest accrued to
the date of payment, as set forth in New Horizons for the
Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987), and minus tax with-
holdings required by Federal and State laws:
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD860
SCHEDULE D
Name Amount
Jamie Allen $770.00
Jessica Banwell $1530.80
Linda Beifuss $770.00
Sonya Brow $910.00
Mary Clerkley $910.00
Angela Cordero $770.00
Kahran Dean $1217.20
Sandra Ezrow $910.00
Frances Fineran $2745.20
Jennifer Flores $967.67
Rose Gray $950.00
Kathy Havens $910.00
Alina Hawkins $910.00
Amber Joseph $720.00
Brian Marshall $2076.80
David Marshall $910.00
Evelyn Marshall $970.00
Jessie Marshall $2024.40
Rita Marshall $5754.00
Linda Messner $1537.47
Troy Minneboo $1010.00
Gail Montgomery $2091.60
Lois Montgomery $3872.96
Dianna McInnes $1530.00
India Neill $910.00
Robert Nelson $2572.00
Laura Nixon $910.00
Beth Novak $5050.00
Carolyn Olejniczak $4986.80
Michael Patrick $787.60
Debra Pena $3338.00
Amber Puckett $850.00
Toni Quinn $1450.00
Tiffany Reeves $770.00
Robyn Scott $770.00
Amy Stevens $770.00
Andrea Stone $1530.00
Kimberly Tansley $910.00
Doranne Taylor $970.00
Heather Titus $1662.78
Erika Wahl $910.00
Mary Ward $1468.98
Sarah Wasper $1010.00
TOTAL $68,414.26
(c) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place des-
ignated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records,
social security payment records, timecards, personnel
records and reports, and all other records including an
electronic copy of such records if stored in electronic
form, necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due un-
der the terms of this Order.
(d) Within 14 days after service by the Region, duplicate
and mail, at its own expense and after being signed by the
Respondent’s authorized representative, copies of the at-
STOCKBRIDGE COUNTRY MANOR 861
tached notice marked “Appendix”3 to the Union and to
all unit employees who were employed by the Respon-
dent at any time since October 1, 2007.
(e) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a
responsible official on a form provided by the Region
attesting to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated Federal labor law and has ordered us to post and
obey this notice.
FEDERAL LAW GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO
Form, join, or assist a union
Choose representatives to bargain with us on
your behalf
Act together with other employees for your
benefit and protection
Choose not to engage in any of these protected
activities.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to bargain collectively
and in good faith with SEIU Healthcare Michigan as
the exclusive collective-bargaining representative of
the employees in the unit by unilaterally failing to pay
contractual wage raises to unit employees; failing to
pay vacation pay to unit employees; and failing to pro-
vide the Union with a meaningful opportunity to bar-
gain over the effects of our decision to permanently
close our Stockbridge, Michigan facility and terminate
the employees in the unit. The appropriate unit is:
All regular full-time and regular part-time nurse as-
sistants, CENAs, bath and rehab aides, cooks dietary
aides, laundry and housekeeping aides, and mainte-
nance employees employed by us at our facility lo-
cated at 406 West Main Street, Stockbridge, Michi-
gan; but excluding the administrator, office manager,
activity director, social worker, director of nursing,
charge nurses, dietary supervisor, housekeeping su-
pervisor, laundry supervisor, maintenance supervi-
sors, probationary employees, and all other employ-
ees such as nurses, activity aides, office employ-

3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court
of appeals, the words in the notice reading “Mailed By Order of the
National Labor Relations Board” shall read “Mailed Pursuant to a
Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order
of the National Labor Relations Board.”
ees/staff, ward clerks, all other supervisors and guards as
defined in the Act.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with,
restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights guaran-
teed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL, on request, bargain collectively and in good
faith with the Union concerning the effects on the unit em-
ployees of our decision to permanently close our Stock-
bridge, Michigan facility, and reduce to writing and sign
any agreement reached as a result of such bargaining.
WE WILL make the unit employees whole for any loss of
earnings and other benefits suffered as a result of our fail-
ure to pay contractual wage raises, and vacation pay to unit
employees, and to bargain with the Union concerning the
effects on unit employees of our decision to permanently
close our Stockbridge, Michigan facility, by paying them
the amounts following their names, plus interest accrued to
the date of payment, and minus tax withholdings required
by Federal and State laws.
862
SCHEDULE D
Name Amount
Jamie Allen $770.00
Jessica Banwell $1530.80
Linda Beifuss $770.00
Sonya Brow $910.00
Mary Clerkley $910.00
Angela Cordero $770.00
Kahran Dean $1217.20
Sandra Ezrow $910.00
Frances Fineran $2745.20
Jennifer Flores $967.67
Rose Gray $950.00
Kathy Havens $910.00
Alina Hawkins $910.00
Amber Joseph $720.00
Brian Marshall $2076.80
David Marshall $910.00
Evelyn Marshall $970.00
Jessie Marshall $2024.40
Rita Marshall $5754.00
Linda Messner $1537.47
Troy Minneboo $1010.00
Gail Montgomery $2091.60
Lois Montgomery $3872.96
Dianna McInnes $1530.00
India Neill $910.00
Robert Nelson $2572.00
Laura Nixon $910.00
Beth Novak $5050.00
Carolyn Olejniczak $4986.80
Michael Patrick $787.60
Debra Pena $3338.00
Amber Puckett $850.00
Toni Quinn $1450.00
Tiffany Reeves $770.00
Robyn Scott $770.00
Amy Stevens $770.00
Andrea Stone $1530.00
Kimberly Tansley $910.00
Doranne Taylor $970.00
Heather Titus $1662.78
Erika Wahl $910.00
Mary Ward $1468.98
Sarah Wasper $1010.00
TOTAL $68,414.26
CONVALCARE CORP. D/B/A STOCKBRIDGE
COUNTRY MANOR