§

Spier Wines (PTY) Ltd. v. Ofer Z. Shepher

No. 91182155 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 12, 2012)
Spier Wines (PTY) Ltd. v. Ofer Z. Shepher

8 Cited authorities

  1. Microstrategy Inc. v. Business Objects, S.A

    429 F.3d 1344 (Fed. Cir. 2005)   Cited 154 times
    Holding that "this court reviews a district court's evidentiary rulings under the law of the regional circuit"

  2. Best Cellars Inc. v. Grape Finds at Dupont

    No. 99CIV12254(RWS) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2000)   Cited 54 times
    Finding that the overall layout of a wine store could be, and was, inherently distinctive

  3. Bose Corp. v. QSC Audio Products, Inc.

    293 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2002)   Cited 35 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Bose Corp. v. QSC Audio Prods., Inc., 293 F.3d 1367, 1375 (Fed.Cir.2002), this court held that the marks WAVE and ACOUSTIC WAVE have trademark strength independent of the Bose “house mark,” although the marks appear in the same sales literature.

  4. Design Strategies, Inc. v. Davis

    228 F.R.D. 210 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)   Cited 6 times

    Jack S. Dweck, The Dweeck Law Firm, LLP, New York City, for Plaintiff. Leonard Benowich, Roosevelt, Benowich & Lewis, L.L.P., White Plains, NY, R. Scott Garley, Gibbons, Del Deo, Dolan, Griffinger & Vecchione, P.C., New York City, for Defendants. DECISION AND ORDER MARRERO, District Judge. Plaintiff Design Strategy, Inc. (" Design" ) submitted a motion in limine requesting that the Court preclude defendants Marc E. Davis (" Davis" ), Info Technologies, Inc., Info Technologies Web Solutions, Inc.

  5. Rule 26 - Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 26   Cited 99,695 times   680 Legal Analyses
    Adopting Fed.R.Civ.P. 37

  6. Rule 37 - Failure to Make Disclosures or to Cooperate in Discovery; Sanctions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 37   Cited 47,839 times   332 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party may be barred from using a witness if it fails to disclose the witness

  7. Rule 30 - Depositions by Oral Examination

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 30   Cited 16,821 times   134 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a district court's decision not to consider the plaintiff's deposition errata sheets in opposition to a motion for summary judgment when they were untimely

  8. Rule 31 - Depositions by Written Questions

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 31   Cited 1,118 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that a party must seek leave of court to depose by written question any person "before the time specified in Rule 26(d)"