Southland Paint Co., Inc.

16 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board
323 U.S. 248 (1944) Cited 162 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
Colson Corporation v. N.L.R.B
347 F.2d 128 (8th Cir. 1965) Cited 35 times
Finding that a repudiation three weeks after unlawful conduct was inadequate
Snow v. N.L.R.B
308 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1962) Cited 30 times
In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.
N.L.R.B. v. Soft Water Laundry, Inc.
346 F.2d 930 (5th Cir. 1965) Cited 26 times
No. 21303. June 15, 1965. Richard P. Lawlor, Atty., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jesse S. Hogg, Tampa, Fla., Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey Trenam, Tampa, Fla., of counsel, for respondent. Before WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. GEWIN, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of an order issued against
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Linda Jo Shoe Co.
307 F.2d 355 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 18 times
No. 18772. August 7, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Earle W. Putnam, Trial Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Abraham A. Dash, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Harold E. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Karl H. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before JONES, BROWN and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. JONES, Circuit Judge. The respondent, Linda Jo Shoe Company,
N.L.R.B. v. Dal-Tex Optical Company
310 F.2d 58 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 17 times
In NLRB v. Dal-Tex Optical Co., 310 F.2d 58, 60-61 (CA5 1962), the court sustained the Board, 131 N.L.R.B. 715, 721 (1961), in affording protection to an employee, Whitaker, who appeared but did not testify at a Board hearing.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Blue Bell
219 F.2d 796 (5th Cir. 1955) Cited 24 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Blue Bell Inc., 219 F.2d 796 (4) (5 Cir. 1955) a female employee wrote a letter to employer's vice-president calling him a "liar".
United Aircraft
333 F.2d 819 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 13 times
In United Aircraft v. NLRB, 333 F.2d 819 (1964), cert. den., 380 U.S. 910, 85 S.Ct. 893, 13 L.Ed.2d 796 (1965), the Second Circuit held that trainees had a sufficient community of interest for inclusion in the bargaining unit.

Southland Paint Co., Inc.

16 Cited authorities

Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice

Finding that a repudiation three weeks after unlawful conduct was inadequate

In Snow, both the employer and the Union chose the clergyman who ran the check and he compared signatures, not just names.

In NLRB v. Dal-Tex Optical Co., 310 F.2d 58, 60-61 (CA5 1962), the court sustained the Board, 131 N.L.R.B. 715, 721 (1961), in affording protection to an employee, Whitaker, who appeared but did not testify at a Board hearing.

In National Labor Relations Board v. Blue Bell Inc., 219 F.2d 796 (4) (5 Cir. 1955) a female employee wrote a letter to employer's vice-president calling him a "liar".

In United Aircraft v. NLRB, 333 F.2d 819 (1964), cert. den., 380 U.S. 910, 85 S.Ct. 893, 13 L.Ed.2d 796 (1965), the Second Circuit held that trainees had a sufficient community of interest for inclusion in the bargaining unit.