§

Singer Sewing Machine Co.

150 N.L.R.B. 1319 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Singer Sewing Machine Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Sprague v. Ticonic Bank

    307 U.S. 161 (1939)   Cited 1,047 times
    Holding that because a petition for fees is "an independent proceeding supplemental to the original," the suggestion "that it came after the end of the term at which the main decree was entered and [is] therefore too late" was unavailing

  2. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  4. In re Sanford Fork Tool Co., Petitioner

    160 U.S. 247 (1895)   Cited 434 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding discretion exists when prior appellate decision reversed lower court but ordered no final judgment

  5. Singer Sewing Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    329 F.2d 200 (4th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    Finding misconduct where there was prima facie evidence that agency violated statute previously construed by multiple courts of appeals (citing Overnite Transp. Co. v. NLRB, 327 F.2d 36 (4th Cir. 1963))

  6. Thornton v. Carter

    109 F.2d 316 (8th Cir. 1940)   Cited 89 times
    Holding that a lower court is bound by the decree of the appellate court and "can only enter a judgment or decree in strict compliance with the [appellate court's] mandate"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Grace Co.

    184 F.2d 126 (8th Cir. 1950)   Cited 43 times

    No. 14107. September 13, 1950. Mozart G. Ratner, Acting Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Irving M. Herman, attorneys, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Burr S. Stottle, Kansas City, Mo. (Robert J. Ingraham, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondent. Clif. Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo. (John J. Manning, Kansas City

  8. East Bay Un. of Machinists v. N.L.R.B

    322 F.2d 411 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 19 times

    Nos. 17275, 17468. Argued April 29, 1963. Decided July 3, 1963. Petitions for Rehearing Before the Division Denied September 27, 1963. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied September 27, 1963. Mr. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, and Michael H. Gottesman, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners in No. 17275 and intervenors in No. 17468. Mr. Marion B. Plant, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Mr. Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D.C., was

  9. Old King Cole v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    260 F.2d 530 (6th Cir. 1958)   Cited 13 times
    Filing petition for review of an order of the Labor Board does not operate as a stay of the Board's order, consistent with Section 10(g) of the NLRA

  10. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Slattery

    102 F.2d 58 (7th Cir. 1939)   Cited 29 times

    No. 6671. February 22, 1939. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, specially constituted under Sec. 266 of the Judicial Code; Evans and Sparks, Circuit Judges, and Wilkerson, District Judge. Action by the Illinois Bell Telephone Company against James M. Slattery and others, constituting the Illinois Commerce Commission, and another, to enjoin enforcement of an order of the Illinois Commerce Commission reducing rates. After permanent