Signal Manufacturing Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware

    198 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1952)   Cited 43 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc., 198 F.2d 645, this Court granted an order of enforcement similar to one in the case now before us. The Board's Supplemental Decision and Order for the payment of back wages was enforced in that case by this Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Incorporated, reported at 228 F.2d 871.
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kentucky Util. Co.

    182 F.2d 810 (6th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Kentucky Utilities Co., 6 Cir., 182 F.2d 810, we recognized the right of management to refuse to bargain with a certain representative of the Union under unusual facts clearly justifying such refusal.
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of Am. v. N.L.R.B

    278 F.2d 181 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13071. Argued March 22, 1960. Decided April 21, 1960. Nahum A. Bernstein and George H. Kaplan, New York City (Silver, Bernstein, Seawell Kaplan, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Donald J. Bardell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Isaac N. Groner, Washington, D.C

  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Roscoe Skipper

    213 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 6 times

    No. 14885. June 18, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott. General Counsel, Owsley Vose, John C. Rohrbaugh, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Kontz Bennett, Waycross, Ga. (Bennett, Pedrick Bennett, Waycross, Ga., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. This small tempest

  5. Bethlehem Steel Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Board

    191 F.2d 340 (D.C. Cir. 1951)   Cited 4 times
    In Bethlehem Steel, supra n. 3, the Board was faced with similar policy arguments for the proposition that an employer may insist on a waiver of ยง 9(a) rights as a condition to a collective bargaining agreement.