Shannon Construction, IncDownload PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 22, 1989292 N.L.R.B. 1276 (N.L.R.B. 1989) Copy Citation 1276 DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Shannon Construction , Inc and International Broth- erhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Local Union No 7 Case 8-CA-20596 February 22, 1989 DECISION AND ORDER By CHAIRMAN STEPHENS AND MEMBERS JOHANSEN AND CRACRAFT Upon a charge filed by the Union December 3, 1987, and an amended charge filed on January 28, 1988, the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board issued a complaint March 31, 1988, against Shannon Construction, Inc, the Re spondent, alleging that it has violated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the National Labor Relations Act The Respondent has failed to file an answer On May 23, 1988, the General Counsel filed a Motion for Summary Judgment On May 25, 1988, the Board issued an order transferring the proceed- ing to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause why the motion should not be granted On June 6, 1988, the Union also filed a Motion for Summary Judg ment On June 13, 1988, the Respondent's counsel filed a response to the Board's Notice to Show Cause On December 16, 1988, the Board issued a Supplemental Notice to Show Cause, and the Re- spondent's counsel filed a response to the Board's supplemental notice on December 23, 1988 The National Labor Relations Board has delegat- ed its authority in this proceeding to a three- member panel Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment Section 102 20 of the Board's Rules and Regula- tions provides that the allegations in the complaint shall be deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within 14 days from service of the complaint, unless good cause is shown The complaint states that unless an answer is filed within 14 days of service, "all the allegations in the Complaint shall be deemed to be admitted to be true and shall be so found by the Board " Further, the undisputed alle gations in the Motion for Summary Judgment dis close that counsel for the General Counsel tele phoned the Respondent's counsel on April 29, 1988, and was told that the Respondent did not intend to file an answer At that time, counsel for the General Counsel advised the Respondent's counsel orally and in a letter dated April 29, 1988, that if an answer was not filed by the close of busi ness on May 6, 1988, the General Counsel would move for summary judgment As noted, the Re- spondent has failed to file an answer to the com plaint The response to the Notice to Show Cause, signed by the Respondent's counsel, states that the Respondent has sent to the Union payment in full that is due," and "thus has no further reason to show cause why payment has not been made " The response also provides that "there is no further reason for the General Counsel's Motion for Sum- mary Judgment to be granted " Attached to the re- sponse is a letter from the Respondent's counsel ad dressed to the Union's counsel along with a copy of a check payable to the Union in the amount of $1902 The letter provides that the check is `for full payment as I understand it for the above refer- enced matter," and that [t]his check is provided to you only under the condition that you agree to do whatever is needed to terminate the NLRB action " The response does not provide any expla- nation why the Respondent did not file an answer to the complaint, nor does it provide any defense to the allegations in the complaint The response to Supplemental Notice to Show Cause submitted by the Respondent's counsel pro vides that all amounts due and owing to the Union have been paid, and that the hearing in this matter originally set for June 27, 1988, was indefinitely postponed by the Regional Director for Region 8 Thus, it was understood by the Respondent that this matter was settled The response to the Board's Supplemental Notice to Show Cause, however, also does not provide any explanation why the Re spondent did not file an answer to the complaint, nor does it provide any defense to the allegations in the complaint Under these circumstances we find that the Re- spondent has not shown good cause for its failure to file a timely answer In the absence of good cause being shown for the failure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Counsel's Motion for Summary Judgment On the entire record, the Board makes the fol- lowing FINDINGS OF FACT I JURISDICTION The Respondent, an Ohio corporation, with an office and place of business in Bedford Heights, Ohio, has been engaged as a general contractor in the construction business at various locations, in cluding locations in the Toledo, Ohio area, where it annually, in the course and conduct of its busi ness operations, purchases and receives at its Bed ford Heights, Ohio facility products, goods, and materials valued in excess of $50,000 directly from points outside the State of Ohio We find that the Respondent is an employer engaged in commerce 292 NLRB No 137 SHANNON CONSTRUCTION 1277 within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and (7) of the Act and that the Union is a labor organization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act II ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES The Union represents the following employees of the Respondent, which constitute a unit appropri- ate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the Act All painting and decorating employees em- ployed by the Employer in the Toledo, Ohio area but excluding all other employees and su- pervisors as defined in the Act About July 1, 1986, the Toledo Chapter Painting and Decorating Contractors of America, Inc and the Union entered into a collective-bargaining agreement (Association Agreement), which by its terms is effective for the period of July 1, 1986, through June 30, 1989 About April 14, 1987, the Respondent entered into an agreement that bound the Respondent to the terms and conditions of em- ployment of the Association Agreement during all times material herein Pursuant to article II of the agreement between the Respondent and the Union, the Respondent is obligated to contribute specified amounts of money into various benefit funds, including the I B P A T National Pension Fund Since August 1987 and continuing, the Respondent has unilaterally failed and refused to make the required contributions to the I B P A T National Pension Fund CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1 By failing and refusing to make the required contributions to the I B P A T National Pension Fund from August 1987 and continuing, the Re spondent has failed and refused to bargain collec tively with the representative of its employees in the above-described unit , and the Respondent thereby has been engaging in unfair labor practices in violation of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act 2 The unfair labor practices affect commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act REMEDY Having found that the Respondent has engaged in certain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and desist and to take certain affirmative action designed to effectuate the policies of the Act Having found that the Respondent violated Sec- tion 8(a)(5) and (1) of the Act by failing to transmit the contributions to the I B P A T National Pen- sion Fund required by the collective bargaining agreement effective from July 1, 1986, through June 30, 1989, we shall order the Respondent to transmit the pension fund contributions it owes to the appropriate fund 1 Any additional amounts ap- plicable to the delinquent payments shall be paid in accordance with the criteria set forth in Merryweather Optical Co, 240 NLRB 1213, 1216 (1979) The Respondent shall also make unit employees whole for any loss of pension plan credits or bene- fits resulting from the Respondent's failure to make required pension plan contributions 2 This shall also include reimbursing employees for any contri- butions they themselves have made for the mainte- nance of the pension plan fund after the Respond ent unlawfully discounted contributions to the fund, with interest as prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded 3 ORDER The National Labor Relations Board orders that the Respondent, Shannon Construction, Inc, Bed- ford Heights, Ohio, its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall 1 Cease and desist from (a) Refusing to bargain collectively with the Union by failing and refusing, without prior notice to or consent of the Union, to make contractually required pension fund contributions (b) In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing employees in the ex- ercise of the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act 2 Take the following affirmative action neces- sary to effectuate the policies of the Act (a) Pay all delinquent pension fund contributions from August 1987 until the present required by the parties collective-bargaining agreement and make the employees whole for any losses resulting from the Respondent's failure to pay pension fund con tributions, in the manner set forth in the remedy section of this decision (b) Preserve and, on request, make available to the Board or its agents for examination and copy ing, all payroll records, social security payment records, timecards, personnel records and reports, and all other records necessary to analyze the amount owed under the terms of this Order ' Any pension fund contributions that the Respondent owes shall of course be offset by the amounts that the Respondent may have paid to the Union for pension fund contributions since August 1987 including the $1902 allegedly sent to the Charging Party on June 6 1988 2 Kraft Plumbing & Heating 252 NLRB 891 fn 2 (1980) enfd 661 F 2d 940 (9th Cir 1981) 3 283 NLRB 1173 (1987) Interest on and after January 1 1987 will be computed at the short term Federal rate for the underpayment of taxes as set out in the 1986 amendment to 26 U S C § 6621 1278 DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD (c) Post at its facility in Bedford Heights, Ohio, copies of the attached notice marked "Appendix 4 Copies of the notice, on forms provided by the Re- gional Director for Region 8, after being signed by the Respondents authorized representative, shall be posted by the Respondent immediately upon re ceipt and maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous places including all places where no tices to employees are customarily posted Reason- able steps shall be taken by the Respondent to ensure that the notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material (d) Notify the Regional Director in writing within 20 days from the date of this Order what steps the Respondent has taken to comply 4 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of appeals the words in the notice reading Posted by Order of the Nation al Labor Relations Board shall read Posted Pursuant to a Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the National Labor Relations Board APPENDIX NOTICE To EMPLOYEES POSTED BY ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD An Agency of the United States Government The National Labor Relations Board has found that we violated the National Labor Relations Act and has ordered us to post and abide by this notice WE WILL NOT refuse to bargain with the Inter national Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Local Union No 7, by failing to make con tractually required pension fund contributions WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce you in the exer- cise of the rights guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act WE WILL transmit to the I B P A T National Pension Fund those contributions required ander the terms of article II of the collective bargaining agreement that we withheld, and WE WILL make employees whole for any losses resulting from our failure to make such payments, with interest SHANNON CONSTRUCTION, INC Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation