§

Ryder Distribution Resources

311 N.L.R.B. 814 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Ryder Distribution Resources

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  4. North American Van Lines, Inc, v. N.L.R.B

    869 F.2d 596 (D.C. Cir. 1989)   Cited 34 times
    Holding that over-the-highway drivers are independent contractors, not employees of moving company that hires them

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Homemaker Shops, Inc.

    724 F.2d 535 (6th Cir. 1984)   Cited 21 times
    Discussing these factors as relevant to analysis of Board's power to amend a complaint

  6. Ballou Brick Co. v. N.L.R.B

    798 F.2d 339 (8th Cir. 1986)   Cited 14 times
    Modifying statement sufficient to render an otherwise invalid statement valid was made two weeks before the start of the union campaign, was announced in affirmative terms, and there was "no evidence that the employees did not know of the rule change"

  7. Days Inn Management Co. v. N.L.R.B

    930 F.2d 211 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 1035, 1255, Dockets 90-4135, 90-4151. Argued February 8, 1991. Decided April 10, 1991. Abner P. Slatt, New York City, and John R. Hunt, Atlanta, Ga. (Slatt and Lane, New York City, Stokes, Lazarus Carmichael, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel), for petitioner-cross-respondent. Karen L. Arndt, Washington, D.C. (Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel for the N.L.R.B., Jerry M. Hunter, General Counsel for the N.L.R.B., Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel for the N.L.R.B., of counsel)

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Streamway Division of the Scott & Fetzer Co.

    691 F.2d 288 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 10 times
    Assuming domination where committee "was expressly mandated by the Company, and the Company controlled its composition and its meetings"

  9. Texas Instruments Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    599 F.2d 1067 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 3 times
    In Texas Instruments, Inc. v. NLRB, 599 F.2d 1067 (1st Cir. 1979), we vacated and remanded that part of a decision of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) finding that Texas Instruments, Inc. (TI) violated sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a)(1), (3) (1976), when it discharged six employees for disseminating information classified by the company as confidential.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Savoy Laundry, Inc.

    327 F.2d 370 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times
    In Savoy Laundry the employer operated one laundry plant where he processed both retail laundry pickups and wholesale laundering.