§

Rochester Regional Joint Board, Local 14A

363 NLRB No. 179 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Rochester Regional Joint Board, Local 14A

12 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    447 U.S. 490 (1980)   Cited 65 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Longshoremen, 447 U.S. 490 (1980) (ILA I), we reviewed the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion that the Rules and their enforcement constituted unlawful secondary activity under §§ 8(b)(4)(B) and 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4) (B) and 158(e).

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    473 U.S. 61 (1985)   Cited 53 times
    Explaining that collective bargaining agreement cannot seek "to achieve union objectives outside the primary employer-employee relationship"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Bhd. of Teamsters

    691 F.3d 49 (1st Cir. 2012)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Determining whether an arrangement comprises an illegal § 8(e) agreement through a “holistic” inquiry into all surrounding circumstances

  5. Spectacor Management Group v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.3d 385 (3d Cir. 2003)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that by enacting the proviso "Congress wished to preserve the status quo regarding agreements between unions and contractors in the construction industry" and ultimately deferring to the Board's interpretation of the proviso

  6. Ley v. Rochester Reg'l Joint Bd.

    59 F. Supp. 3d 565 (W.D.N.Y. 2014)   Cited 2 times

    No. 14–CV–6605 EAW. 11-17-2014 Rhonda P. LEY, Petitioner, v. ROCHESTER REGIONAL JOINT BOARD, LOCAL 14A, Respondent. Jesse S. Feuerstein, National Labor Relations Board, Buffalo, NY, for Petitioner. ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. Jesse S. Feuerstein, National Labor Relations Board, Buffalo, NY, for Petitioner. DECISION AND ORDER ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner, Rhonda P. Ley, (“Petitioner”) Regional Director of the Third Region of the National Labor Relations

  7. International Union of Painters v. N.L.R.B

    309 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times

    Nos. 01-1242 and 01-1323. Argued September 6, 2002. Decided October 25, 2002. On Petition for Review and Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Forrest H. Roles argued the cause and filed the briefs for W.R. Mollohan, Inc. Joseph E. Kolick, Jr. argued the cause for International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, Local Unions No. 970 and 1144, AFL-CIO-CLC. With him on the brief was Kirsten Lea Doolittle. David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor

  8. Kandel v. N.L.R.B

    265 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

    No. 07-1044. January 28, 2008. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Glenn Matthew Taubman, William Louis Messenger, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Springfield, VA, for Petitioners. Steven Brian Goldstein, Attorney, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, David S. Habenstreit, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Before: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH and GARLAND, Circuit Judges. JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This

  9. Blyer v. Staten Island Cable LLC

    03 CV 1755 (NG) (E.D.N.Y. May. 7, 2003)   Cited 3 times

    03 CV 1755 (NG) May 7, 2003 OPINION AND ORDER NICHOLAS G. GARAUFIS, United States District Judge Petitioner, Alvin Blyer, Regional Director of Region 29 of the National Labor Relations Board ("Board"), brings this application pursuant to Section 10(1) of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), 29 U.S.C. § 160 (1), seeking to preliminarily enjoin respondents from engaging in unfair labor practices violative of Section 8(e) of the NLRA, 29 U.S.C. § 158 (e). Specifically, petitioner claims that Section

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders' Union Local 531

    623 F.2d 61 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 15 times
    Holding that a union's threat to strike in order to obtain a provision in a collective bargaining agreement that violated Section 8(e) also violated Sections 8(b) and (B)