11 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wyman-Gordon Co.
394 U.S. 759 (1969) Cited 809 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding invalid a legislative rule developed in agency adjudication
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers
383 U.S. 53 (1966) Cited 732 times 16 Legal AnalysesHolding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company
418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 63 timesOffering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative
Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 64 timesIn Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.
Southwire Company v. N.L.R.B
383 F.2d 235 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 34 times 2 Legal AnalysesDiscussing an employer's right to express an opinion regarding unionization rather than its right to unionize
N.L.R.B. v. Automotive Controls Corporation
406 F.2d 221 (10th Cir. 1969) Cited 17 timesConcluding that employer's statement that it could move its plant at any time, when union had previously stated that employer would violate law by moving its plant if union won election, was protected under section 8(c) and declaring, "[I]t is necessary to guard against the Board adopting an overly restrictive attitude toward employer communications."
Union Carbide Corporation v. N.L.R.B
310 F.2d 844 (6th Cir. 1962) Cited 15 timesNo. 14921. December 26, 1962. William C. Treanor and Henry Clifton, Jr., Buell, Clifton Truner, New York City, for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B. Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before McALLISTER, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Carbide has petitioned this Court to review an order of the
N.L.R.B. v. Dowell Div. of Dow Chemical Co.
420 F.2d 480 (5th Cir. 1969) Cited 5 timesNo. 27714. December 22, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, NLRB, Douglas L. Leslie, Atty., Washington, D.C., Elmer P. Davis, Director, Region 16, NLRB, Fort Worth, Tex., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Robert A. Giannasi, Atty., for petitioner. J.H. Hanes, Wayne Hancock, Midland, Mich., Max D. Rizley, Tulsa, Okla., Karl H. Mueller, Mueller Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, THORNBERRY and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
N.L.R.B. v. Brownwood Manufacturing Company
363 F.2d 136 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 4 timesNo. 22460. July 8, 1966. Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N L R B, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N L R B, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Emil Corenbleth, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before RIVES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and FULTON, District Judge. GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order finding that Brownwood Manufacturing Company had violated § 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1). The decision and
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"