Producers Produce Co.

7 Cited authorities

Edison Co. v. Labor Board
305 U.S. 197 (1938) Cited 19,294 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
Virginian Ry. v. Federation
300 U.S. 515 (1937) Cited 835 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer could be enjoined for failing to “treat” with an elected representative as required by Section 2, Ninth of the RLA
Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.
309 U.S. 350 (1940) Cited 315 times 5 Legal Analyses
Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
Texas N.O.R. Co. v. Ry. Clerks
281 U.S. 548 (1930) Cited 381 times
Finding provision in Railway Labor Act stating that employees' right to designate representatives without interference, influence, or coercion did not violate employer's right to freedom of association
Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines
303 U.S. 261 (1938) Cited 264 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.
Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.
306 U.S. 332 (1939) Cited 139 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
Peck v. Dexter S.P. P. Co.
164 N.Y. 127 (N.Y. 1900) Cited 9 times
Argued June 11, 1900 Decided October 2, 1900 Watson M. Rogers for appellant. Elon R. Brown for respondent. CULLEN, J. This action was brought, servant against master, for damages for wrongful discharge from employment. The plaintiff alleged that he was hired as foreman of defendant's mill for the term of one year. The defendant answered denying that plaintiff's employment was for any stated period and alleging that he was properly discharged for incompetency and misconduct. The evidence tended to

Producers Produce Co.

7 Cited authorities

Edison Co. v. Labor Board

Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay

Virginian Ry. v. Federation

Holding that an employer could be enjoined for failing to “treat” with an elected representative as required by Section 2, Ninth of the RLA

Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

Texas N.O.R. Co. v. Ry. Clerks

Finding provision in Railway Labor Act stating that employees' right to designate representatives without interference, influence, or coercion did not violate employer's right to freedom of association

Labor Bd. v. Greyhound Lines

In National Labor Relations Board v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc., 303 U.S. 261, 58 S.Ct. 571, 572, 82 L.Ed. 831, 115 A.L.R. 307, three related corporations were involved. The two respondents claimed that the third corporation was the `employer'.

Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.

In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.

Peck v. Dexter S.P. P. Co.