5 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.
102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996) Cited 55 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."
National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro
81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996) Cited 17 times 1 Legal AnalysesNoting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"
N.L.R.B. v. Bakersfield Californian
128 F.3d 1339 (9th Cir. 1997) Cited 4 timesReversing district court's holding that section 11 does not authorize the Board to engage in fishing expeditions at the expense of the newspaper's legitimate business interest
Link v. N.L.R.B
330 F.2d 437 (4th Cir. 1964) Cited 13 timesNo. 9304. Argued January 23, 1964. Decided April 14, 1964. Ira Lechner, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras, and Ira Lechner, Attys., N.L.R.B.), for appellee. C. Stuart Wheatley, Danville, Va., for appellant. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and HAYNSWORTH and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges. SOBELOFF, Chief Judge. The owner of a detective agency here appeals from an adjudication of contempt for refusing
N.L.R.B. v. Lewis
310 F.2d 364 (7th Cir. 1962) Cited 12 timesNo. 13726. November 29, 1962. David R. Loewenberg, Sheldon M. Charone, Chicago, Ill., Carmell Charone, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellant. Stephan B. Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., George Squillacote, Atty., N.L.R.B., Chicago, Ill., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., for appellee. Before DUFFY, KILEY and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This appeal is