§

Power Equipment Co.

135 N.L.R.B. 945 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Power Equipment Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jamestown Sterling

    211 F.2d 725 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 29 times

    No. 170, Docket 22862. Argued March 9, 1954. Decided April 5, 1954. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Owsley Vose and Jean Engstrom, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Rogerson Hewes, J. Russell Rogerson, Jamestown, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, MEDINA and HARLAN, Circuit Judges. MEDINA, Circuit Judge. This case involves a more or less typical controversy between employer and employees. In the week of July 7, 1952, following the shutdown of the plant in the Village of Falconer

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corporation of America

    291 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 17 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corp. of America, 2 Cir., 291 F.2d 328, 331, the rule under discussion is stated, "Interrogation of employees is legal, when the questioning is not accompanied by any explicit threats, cf. N.L.R.B. v. Beaner [Beaver] Meadow Creamery, 3 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 247, if under all the circumstances coercion is not implicit in the questioning.

  5. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    217 F.2d 369 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 11 times
    In Boeing Airplane Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd. (217 F.2d 369, 375-376), the board was reversed and the determination of the trial examiner reinstated where "the Trial Examiner discredited the testimony of Gerber" whereas "The Board gave credibility to Gerber and discredited Morrell".

  6. Kimble Glass Company v. Natl. Labor Rel. Board

    230 F.2d 484 (6th Cir. 1956)   Cited 2 times

    No. 12680. February 29, 1956. James M. Guiher, Steptoe Johnson, Clarksburg, W. Va., C.W. Neuhaus, Fred E. Fuller, Toledo, Ohio, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Louis Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case, involving a petition to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board and the Board's cross-petition for enforcement, was heard on the briefs, record and oral argument of counsel. The Board