Petronilla Osuagwu, Complainant,v.Dr. James B. Peake, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 20, 2008
0120081307 (E.E.O.C. May. 20, 2008)

0120081307

05-20-2008

Petronilla Osuagwu, Complainant, v. Dr. James B. Peake, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Petronilla Osuagwu,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. James B. Peake,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120081307

Agency No. 200305802007103357

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated December 18, 2007, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The agency

dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for

untimely EEO counselor contact.

In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to

discrimination on the bases of race (Black) and national origin (Nigerian)

when her excepted appointment as a Registered Nurse was terminated,

effective May 10, 2007, for failure to properly maintain her nursing

license in a timely manner.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints

of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal

Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the

date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a

personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of

the action. The agency asserts that the alleged discriminatory event

occurred on May 10, 2007, but complainant did not initiate contact with

an EEO Counselor until July 13, 2007, which is beyond the forty-five

(45) day limitation period.

On appeal, complainant argues that she met the 45-day deadline with

a letter sent on her behalf by her attorney on June 18, 2007, to the

Director of Veterans Integrated Services Network (VISN Director),

who was the agency official with the authority to rescind or uphold

her termination. In that letter, in addition to arguing that the

termination should be overturned because the agency failed to follow its

usual policies and practices concerning notifying nurses prior to the

expiration of their licenses, the attorney alleged that the termination

was the result of discrimination on the basis of race and national origin.

In addition to the VISN Director, the attorney sent a copy of the letter

to the Medical Center Director and an agency Human Resources Specialist.

When no response to the June 18 letter was received, complainant, by

letter dated July 13, 2007, wrote the agency's EEO office to "reiterate

[her] request for counseling in connection with the Agency's termination

of her employment and failure to reinstate her, or even respond to her

request for post separation review to date."

The Commission has consistently held that a complainant satisfies the

criterion of EEO counselor contact by contacting an agency official

logically connected with the EEO process, even if that official is not an

EEO counselor, and by exhibiting an intent to begin the EEO process. See

Floyd v. National Guard Bureau, EEOC Request No. 05890086 (June 22,

1989); Allen v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05950933

(July 9, 1996). In this case, the complainant, through her attorney,

contacted the VISN Director, the Medical Director and a Human Resources

Specialist within the 45-day limitation period and raised her allegations

of discrimination. While there may be some question about whether

these officials are logically connected with the EEO process, we find

that this contact at least gave rise to a duty of the part of the agency

to direct complainant to an EEO counselor within the limitation period.

Lucy v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01962691 (November

19, 1996). There is no evidence that the agency fulfilled this duty.

Therefore, given the specific circumstances of this case, the Commission

determines that complainant has satisfied the criterion for timely EEO

Counselor contact.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is REVERSED and the complaint is REMANDED to the agency for

further processing in accordance with the following Order.

ORDER (E0408)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claim in accordance with 29

C.F.R. � 1614.108 et seq. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0408)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 20, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120081307

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0120081307