§

Pattern Makers (Michigan Model Mfrs.)

310 N.L.R.B. 929 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Pattern Makers (Michigan Model Mfrs.)

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  2. Pattern Makers' League v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    473 U.S. 95 (1985)   Cited 76 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Upholding the NLRB's interpretation of the Act

  3. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  4. Florida Power Light v. Electrical Workers

    417 U.S. 790 (1974)   Cited 96 times
    In Florida Power Light Co. v. IBEW, Local 641, 417 U.S. 790, 804-05, 94 S.Ct. 2737, 2744-45, 41 L.Ed.2d 477 (1974), the Supreme Court held that no § 8(b)(1)(B) violation occurs unless the disciplined conduct adversely affects the performance of his or her § 8(b)(1)(B) duties.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 340

    481 U.S. 573 (1987)   Cited 33 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding union's policy of fining members who worked for employers not part of a CBA with the union to not constitute an unfair labor practice

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029

    409 U.S. 213 (1972)   Cited 53 times
    In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.

  7. American Broadcasting Cos. v. Writers Guild

    437 U.S. 411 (1978)   Cited 27 times
    In American Broadcasting Cos. v. Writers Guild, West, Inc., 437 U.S. 411 (1978) (ABC), the Court found that discipline imposed on grievance-handling supervisors who crossed union picket lines violated § 8(b)(1)(B), even though the supervisor-members did not adjust grievances for the striking employees, but only for employees whom the striking union did not represent or desire to represent.

  8. Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    826 F.2d 1074 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 72 times
    Holding that "[i]ssue preclusion . . . attaches only to such issues as the parties litigated adversely to each other in the prior litigation."

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Bufco Corp.

    899 F.2d 608 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 33 times
    Adopting Deklewa and applying it retroactively

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Chicago Marine Containers, Inc.

    745 F.2d 493 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 19 times
    Noting that there may be situations in which it might be inappropriate to be strictly bound by the Midland standard