§

Paintsville Hospital Co., Inc.

278 N.L.R.B. 724 (N.L.R.B. 1986)
Paintsville Hospital Co., Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  2. City of Santa Clara v. Andrus

    439 U.S. 859 (1978)   Cited 170 times
    Holding unreviewable the Secretary's allocation of power between preference entities and holding that "banking" of power with a private utility for later sale to preference entities was in fact a sale, and thus violated the preference clause because it occurred when a preference entity's power was being withdrawn

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Hendricks County Rural Electric Membership Corp.

    454 U.S. 170 (1981)   Cited 79 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Hendricks, the Supreme Court approved the Board's "labor-nexus" rule as determinative of whether or not a worker is to be deemed a confidential employee.

  4. Caskey Baking Co. v. Virginia

    313 U.S. 117 (1941)   Cited 49 times
    In Caskey Baking Co. v. Virginia, 313 U.S. 117, 85 L. ed. 1223, an attack was made on the Tax Code of the State of Virginia which imposed an annual tax on everyone peddling and delivering merchandise in the State other than a manufacturer taxable on its capital by the State, or a wholesale dealer regularly licensed by the State. A license fee of $100 for each vehicle used in the business of such nonresident was fixed.

  5. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  6. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  7. Jays Foods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    573 F.2d 438 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 22 times
    Concluding that work could be re-contracted for legitimate business reasons, with the effect that discriminatees were placed on an "employment merry-go-round"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ace Comb Co.

    342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ace Comb Co., 342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965) and N.L.R.B. v. Bird Machine Co., 161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947), where instructions to supervisory employees not to make coercive statements did not relieve employer of imputed liability it is indicated that it might be otherwise if these instructions had been communicated to the employees.

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Maidsville Coal Co., Inc.

    718 F.2d 658 (4th Cir. 1983)   Cited 5 times
    Enforcing bargaining order where employer discharged four union supporters for their union activities and interrogated employees regarding their union sympathies

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Maidsville Coal Co., Inc.

    693 F.2d 1119 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-2155. Argued June 11, 1982. Decided November 15, 1982. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Granted February 16, 1983. David S. Fishback, Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Robert M. Steptoe, Jr., Clarksburg, W. Va. (C. David Morrison, Clarksburg, W. Va., on brief), for respondent. Kenneth J. Yablonski, Lawrence

  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,589 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party