Ozark Trailers, Inc.

23 Cited authorities

John Wiley Sons v. Livingston
376 U.S. 543 (1964) Cited 1,771 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation
Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 731 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Telegraphers v. Ry. Express Agency
321 U.S. 342 (1944) Cited 672 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding the principles of J.I. Case apply to RLA cases
Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 times
Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.
380 U.S. 263 (1965) Cited 168 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason
Telegraphers v. Chicago N.W. R. Co.
362 U.S. 330 (1960) Cited 140 times
Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey
233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956) Cited 133 times
In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).
Inland Steel Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board
170 F.2d 247 (7th Cir. 1949) Cited 156 times 2 Legal Analyses
Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"

Ozark Trailers, Inc.

23 Cited authorities

Holding that a court should decide whether an arbitration agreement survived a corporate merger and bound the resulting corporation

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding the principles of J.I. Case apply to RLA cases

Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia

Accepting the Board's conclusion "that the term `wages' . . . must be construed to include emoluments of value, like pension and insurance benefits, which may accrue to employees out of their employment relationship"