§

O.G.S. Technologies, Inc.

347 N.L.R.B. 299 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
O.G.S. Technologies, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  5. Furniture Rentors of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    36 F.3d 1240 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer was not required to bargain over subcontracting because decision was based on reduced productivity, damaged product, customer complaints, and employee theft rather than labor costs

  6. The Idaho Statesman v. N.L.R.B

    836 F.2d 1396 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 17 times
    Stating that § 8 protects mandatory, but not permissive, subjects of bargaining

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Citizens Hotel Company

    326 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 29 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Citizens Hotel Co., 5 Cir., 326 F.2d 501, dealing with a somewhat similar unilateral termination of a bonus, we stated: "There was, therefore, an impermissible unilateral change constituting a failure to bargain."

  8. Schwartz v. United States

    84 F.2d 637 (5th Cir. 1936)

    No. 7994. July 2, 1936. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida; Halsted L. Ritter, Judge. Louis J. Schwartz was convicted for failing to file tax return, and he appeals. Affirmed. Vincent C. Giblin and Fred Pine, both of Miami, Fla., for appellant. W. Sanders Gramling, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Harry G. Taylor, Sp. Atty. Bureau of Internal Revenue and Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., both of Miami, Fla., for the United States. Before SIBLEY, HUTCHESON, and HOLMES