§

Offshore Mariners United

338 N.L.R.B. 745 (N.L.R.B. 2002)
Offshore Mariners United

21 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.

    437 U.S. 214 (1978)   Cited 963 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a FOIA requestor's rights are neither “diminished” nor “enhanced” in light of a “particular, litigation-generated need for these materials”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc.

    102 F.3d 1005 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 55 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB was not conducting "improper pre-trial discovery" by issuing investigative subpoenas because it "was merely exercising its congressionally authorized investigative powers, nothing more."

  3. Silverman v. Commodity Futures Trading Com'n

    549 F.2d 28 (7th Cir. 1977)   Cited 58 times
    In Silverman, supra at 33, we fully concurred in the Commission's finding that petitioner had wilfully violated the anti-fraud provision of the 1936 Act (7 U.S.C. § 6b) and held that the suspension of his trading privileges was justified by the record.

  4. Yashon v. Hunt

    825 F.2d 1016 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 34 times
    Finding no right to counsel at a post-deprivation hearing of a doctor denied surgical privileges

  5. Emhart Industries, Hartford Div. v. N.L.R.B

    907 F.2d 372 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 27 times
    Denying enforcement of Board order because partial implementation of pre-impasse offer not found to be unfair labor practice

  6. National Labor Relations v. Carolina Food Pro

    81 F.3d 507 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that a court should enforce an NLRB subpoena "if the information sought is relevant" and "described with sufficient particularly"

  7. New England Medical Center Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 377 (1st Cir. 1977)   Cited 35 times
    Denying FOIA disclosure on the merits, under exemption 7, for the same reasons

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Bakersfield Californian

    128 F.3d 1339 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 4 times
    Reversing district court's holding that section 11 does not authorize the Board to engage in fishing expeditions at the expense of the newspaper's legitimate business interest

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Rex Disposables

    494 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 22 times
    Allowing complaint alleging threats, layoffs, coercive interrogations, and surveillance of union meetings to stand despite dismissal of charges filed by union alleging specific layoffs of five employees because of union activity

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Washington Heights-West Harlem-Inwood Mental Health Council, Inc.

    897 F.2d 1238 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 6 times
    Declining to resolve an issue “because the parties did not brief this issue and because its resolution is not necessary to our holding today”

  11. Section 102.118 - Present and former Board employees prohibited from producing documents and testifying; production of witnesses' statements after direct testimony

    29 C.F.R. § 102.118   Cited 57 times

    (a)Prohibition on producing files and documents. Except as provided in § 102.117 respecting requests cognizable under the Freedom of Information Act, no present or former employee or specially designated agent of the Agency will produce or present any files, documents, reports, memoranda, or records of the Board or of the General Counsel, whether in response to a subpoena duces tecum or otherwise, without the written consent of the Board or the Chairman of the Board if the document is in Washington