Northwestern Publishing Co.

14 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 times
In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
N.L.R.B. v. Rapid Bindery, Inc.
293 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1961) Cited 48 times
In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Houston Chronicle
211 F.2d 848 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 54 times
Subcontracting union work
National Labor Rel. Board v. J.H. Allison Co.
165 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1948) Cited 44 times
No. 10411. January 26, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board, for enforcement of its order directing J.H. Allison Co. to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively concerning so-called "merit wage increases" with a labor union, as exclusive representative and bargaining agent of its production workers and to grant no merit wage increases to such employees without prior consultation with the union
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors
196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952) Cited 37 times
No. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations
Jays Foods, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
292 F.2d 317 (7th Cir. 1961) Cited 21 times
Concluding that employer's decision to make changes in operations and abandon part of business was a basic management decision falling outside of NLRA's purview
N.L.R.B. v. Adams Dairy, Inc.
322 F.2d 553 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 17 times
No. 17171. September 12, 1963. Rehearings Denied October 11, 1963. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner and Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. J. Leonard Schermer, St. Louis, Mo., for respondent. J. Leonard Schermer and Sylvan
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Southland Mfg. Co.
201 F.2d 244 (4th Cir. 1952) Cited 29 times
Recognizing that Board's legitimately drawn conclusion in discharge proceeding is "binding upon the courts" because courts "are without power to find facts or to substitute their judgment for that of the Board"
N.L.R.B. v. Lassing
284 F.2d 781 (6th Cir. 1960) Cited 16 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Lassing, 284 F.2d 781 (C.A.6, 1960), this Court held that an employer may curtail operations, with a resulting loss of employment on certain employees, as long as the changes in operations are not illegally motivated.

Northwestern Publishing Co.

14 Cited authorities

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

In NLRB v. Rapid Bindery Inc., 293 F.2d at 176, the Second Circuit held that "conjecture or rumor is not an adequate substitute for an employer's formal notice to a union of a vital change in working conditions.

Subcontracting union work

Concluding that employer's decision to make changes in operations and abandon part of business was a basic management decision falling outside of NLRA's purview

Recognizing that Board's legitimately drawn conclusion in discharge proceeding is "binding upon the courts" because courts "are without power to find facts or to substitute their judgment for that of the Board"

In National Labor Relations Board v. Lassing, 284 F.2d 781 (C.A.6, 1960), this Court held that an employer may curtail operations, with a resulting loss of employment on certain employees, as long as the changes in operations are not illegally motivated.