Neff Concrete Products Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 6, 194773 N.L.R.B. 1499 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation III the Matter of NEFF CONCRETE PRODUCTS CO., EMPLOYER and UNITED BRICK AND CLAY WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFFILIATED WITH THE A. F. OF L., PETITIONER Ca.se No. 13-R-41212.-Decided June 6, 1947 Mr. W. A. Neff, of Danville, Ill., for the Employer. Mr. Oscar Erhardt, of Chicago, Ill., for the Petitioner. Mr. Orville E. Rhode, of Danville, Ill., for the Operating Engineers. Mr. Grover Allen, of Danville, Ill., for the Hod Carriers. Mr. Samuel G. Hamilton, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Danville, Illinois, on March 4, 1947, before Joseph L. Hektoen, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from preju- dicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. TILE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER Neff Concrete Products Company, an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business located at Danville, Illinois, is engaged in the manufacture of concrete building blocks. During the past year, the Employer purchased more than $75,000 worth of raw materials, consisting of cement, sand, and gravel, of which approximately 95 percent represented shipments from points outside the State of Illi- nois. During the same period, approximately 30 percent of its finished products, worth more than $75,000, was shipped to points outside the State of Illinois. The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 73 N. L . R. B., No. 253. 1499 1500 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization affiliated with "the American Federation of Labor, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 841, herein called the Operating Engineers, and International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America, A. F. L., Local 624, herein called the Hod Carriers, are labor organizations affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, claiming to represent em- ployees of the Employer. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. On January 9, 1941, the Hod Carriers entered into a contract with the Employer. The Hod Carriers claims that this contract was to remain in operation until January 9, 1942, and from year to year there- after unless terminated by notice given by either party at least sixty (60) days prior to January 9 of any year.' The Hod Carriers further claims that this contract was automatically renewed until 1946. The Employer asserts that it expired by its own terms in 1942. In effect, the Hod Carriers contends that this contract, together with an alleged verbal interim agreement, constitutes a bar to this proceeding. In October 1946, the Hod Carriers presented the Employer with a form of new contract, stating that if it were not executed the employees would strike. Since a new contract was not executed, and the verbal interim agreement had previously expired on December 31, 1946, the employees struck in January 1947. They returned to work on Janu- ary 29, 1947, the day following the filing of the petition herein. Assuming that the 1941 contract was then in existence, and con- tained the automatic renewal clause described by the Hod Carriers, the Hod Carriers, in presenting a form of new contract in October 1946, more than sixty (60) days prior to the operative date of the automatic renewal clause, thereby evinced a desire to terminate the 1941 contract as of its 1947 anniversary date and forestalled operation of the alleged renewal clause. Since no new contract was signed, and the verbal interim agreement, if otherwise effective, having expired, there was no contract in existence between the Hod Carriers and the Employer which could constitute a bar to this proceeding, when the Petitioner filed its petition on January 28, 1947. Consequently, there is no bar to a present determination of representatives.' 1 No copy of the contract was introduced into evidence at the hearing. 2 Matter of The William Koehl Company, 65 N. L. R. B. 190,; Matter of Wisconsin Telephone Company , 65 N. L. R. B 368. NEFF CONCRETE PRODtiCT5 CO. 1501 We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Petitioner seeks a unit comprising all production employees of the Employer, including the mixing-man and crane operators, but excluding all office and clerical employees, and all supervisory em- ployees. The Employer and the Hod Carriers agree that the unit sought by the Petitioner is appropriate. The Operating Engineers seeks to carve out of the unit sought by the Petitioner a separate unit comprising the mixing-man and the crane operators. The entire operation of making concrete building blocks is largely automatic. The mixing-man operates a cement mixing machine; the two crane operators operate industrial trucks or cranes. The work of all production employees appears to be closely interrelated, interde- pendent, and to requires similar skills. The unit of all production em- ployees sought by the Petitioner is the unit covered by the 1941 contract of the Hod Carriers, and there is nothing in the record to indicate that the employees sought by the Operating Engineers were not included within the contract unit.' For the foregoing reasons, we find that all production employees of the Employer, including the mixing-man and crane operators, but excluding all office and clerical employees, and all supervisory em- ployees with authority to hire, promote, discharge, discipline, or other- wise effect changes in the status of employees, or effectively recommend such action, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION' As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the pur- poses of collective bargaining with Neff Concrete Products Co., Dan- ville, Illinois, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the Na- tional Labor Relations Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and 203.56, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 4, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately pre- ceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not 'Moreover, the Operating Engineers admitted at the hearing that it had no showing of interest among the employees it seeks to represent. ' Any participant in the election herein may , upon its prompt request to , and approval thereof by , the Regional Director , have its name removed from the ballot. 1502 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD work during said pay -roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election , to determine whether they desire to be represented by United Brick and Clay Workers of America, affiliated with the A. F. of L., or by International Hod Carriers, Building and Common Laborers Union of America , A. F. L., Local 624, for the purposes of collective bargain- ing, or by neither. CHAIRMAN HERZOG took no part in the consideration of the above Decision and Direction of Election. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation