§

NC-DSH,LLP d/b/a Desert Springs Hospital Medical Center

363 NLRB No. 185 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
NC-DSH,LLP d/b/a Desert Springs Hospital Medical Center

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 274 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  7. Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    652 F.3d 22 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that a worker telling a supervisor he had “better bring [his] boxing gloves” in a dispute over break time did not lose the Act's protection

  8. Three D, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    629 F. App'x 33 (2d Cir. 2015)   Cited 3 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that something "violates [the NLRA's interference provision] if it would reasonably tend to chill employees in the exercise of their [NLRA rights]"

  9. Palace Sports Entm't, Inc. v. NLRB

    411 F.3d 212 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 6 times

    No. 04-1261, 04-1276. Argued March 18, 2005. Decided May 31, 2005. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Robert M. Vercruysse argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Gary S. Fealk. David A. Fleischer, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Assistant General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong

  10. Underwriters Laboratories Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    147 F.3d 1048 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 97-70646, 97-70841 Argued and Submitted April 13, 1998 — San Francisco, California. Filed June 22, 1998 Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. NLRB No. 32-CA-13189 COUNSEL Allen J. Gross, Mitchell, Silberberg Knupp, Los Angeles, California, for the petitioner-cross-respondent. James S. Scott A. Donald Rhoads, National Labor Relations Board, Oakland, California; Aileen A. Armstrong, Office of the General Counsel, National