Morris Healthcare & Rehabilitation

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors
  3. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
  4. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
  6. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
  7. Dupont Dow Elastomers, L.L.C. v. N.L.R.B

    296 F.3d 495 (6th Cir. 2002)   Cited 27 times
    Defining "substantial evidence" under arbitrary-and-capricious review as "such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion"
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Advanced Stretchforming Intern

    233 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2000)   Cited 19 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged rulings
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Pinkston-Hollar Const. Services

    954 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1992)   Cited 18 times

    No. 90-4483. February 27, 1992. John D. Burgoyne, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Margaret Bezou, Linda Dreehen, for petitioner. David M. Thomas, Neil Martin, Fulbright Jaworski, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Michael Dunn, Director, Region 23, Ft. Worth, Tex., for other interested parties. Ted B. Kuhn, Buttvill Kuhn, Houston, Tex., for Local 116. Petition for Review of an Order of The National Labor Relations Board. Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, JOHNSON

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Joe B. Foods, Inc.

    953 F.2d 287 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 15 times
    Finding that dispositive recommendations on employee hiring is an indicia of supervisory status
  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355