§

Monfort of Colorado, Inc.

256 N.L.R.B. 612 (N.L.R.B. 1981)
Monfort of Colorado, Inc.

18 Cited authorities

  1. Baxter v. Palmigiano

    425 U.S. 308 (1976)   Cited 2,648 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a party’s refusal to testify in response to probative evidence offered against it in a civil action permits an adverse inference

  2. Skyline Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    613 F.2d 1328 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 104 times
    Stating that conclusory assertion in brief could not establish that company had exercised due diligence in obtaining new evidence

  3. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  4. Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assu. Co.

    286 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 152 times
    Holding that a fifty-eight-year-old newspaper article describing a contemporaneous fire in the clock tower of a courthouse, which article did not fall under a recognized hearsay exception, was nonetheless admissible where that account was trustworthy, necessary, relevant, and material to the issue of whether lightning caused the tower to collapse

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Big Bear Supermarkets No. 3

    640 F.2d 924 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 28 times
    Upholding a finding of single employer status in part due to the fact that the transfer of ownership to an insider for no consideration did not bear the hallmarks of a bona fide transaction

  7. Packing House Indus. Services v. N.L.R.B

    590 F.2d 688 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 77-1691, 77-1726. Submitted October 18, 1978. Decided December 21, 1978. William H. Bruckner, Tate, Bruckner Sykes, Houston, Tex., and Kenneth R. Carr, Grambling, Mounce, Sims, Galatzan Harris, El Paso, Tex., for petitioner. David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., N.L.R.B.,

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Clement Brothers Company

    407 F.2d 1027 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 27 times

    No. 25319. February 12, 1969. Rehearing Denied July 17, 1969. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, John I. Taylor, Michael N. Sohn, Linda Sher, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry L. Griffin, Jr., Overton A. Currie, William T. Wood, Smith, Currie Hancock, Atlanta, Ga., for Clement Brothers Co., Inc., Mark G. Kaplan, Boston, Mass., Angoff, Goldman, Manning Pyle, Boston, Mass., for International Union

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Food Employers Council, Inc.

    399 F.2d 501 (9th Cir. 1968)   Cited 24 times
    In NLRB v. Food Employers Council, Inc., 399 F.2d 501 (9th Cir. 1968), the Board, in denying accretion, found that snack bar employees in retail food markets had common interests separate and distinct from the other retail clerks in the market.

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. James Thompson

    208 F.2d 743 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 41 times
    Reinstating ALJ's findings after Board reversal