§

Mike Persia Chevrolet Corp. of Houston

134 N.L.R.B. 1402 (N.L.R.B. 1961)
Mike Persia Chevrolet Corp. of Houston

18 Cited authorities

  1. Interstate Circuit v. U.S.

    306 U.S. 208 (1939)   Cited 512 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey

    233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 133 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ferguson

    257 F.2d 88 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 38 times

    No. 16973. June 30, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, Ralph W. Malone, Malone, Lipscomb Seay, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is a Petition by the Board for enforcement of an Order, 118 N.L.R.B. No. 30, finding the Employer, Shovel Supply Company, guilty of 8(a)(1), 29 U.S.C.A. § 158(a)(1), violations and requiring the reinstatement of four

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tex-O-Kan F. Mills

    122 F.2d 433 (5th Cir. 1941)   Cited 60 times
    In NLRB v. Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills Co., 122 F.2d 433 (5th Cir. 1941) the Fifth Circuit stated that the employer's sworn denial of anti-union animus in discharging employees could not be disregarded merely on suspicion that he may be lying unless there is substantial impeachment or contradiction of him.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kohler Company

    220 F.2d 3 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 30 times

    Nos. 11272, 11283. March 7, 1955. Rehearing Denied April 7, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Irving M. Herman, Atty., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. William F. Howe, Washington, D.C., Lyman C. Conger, Edward J. Hammer, Kohler, Wis., Jerome Powell, Gall, Lane Howe, Washington, D.C., for Kohler Co. Max Raskin, Milwaukee, Wis., David Rabinovitz, Sheboygan

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Robbins Tire

    161 F.2d 798 (5th Cir. 1947)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire Rubber Co., 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 798, 800, where the proportion of the witnesses against, to those for, the examiner's conclusions was far greater than it is here, we held exactly to the contrary of this contention.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corporation of America

    291 F.2d 328 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 17 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Firedoor Corp. of America, 2 Cir., 291 F.2d 328, 331, the rule under discussion is stated, "Interrogation of employees is legal, when the questioning is not accompanied by any explicit threats, cf. N.L.R.B. v. Beaner [Beaver] Meadow Creamery, 3 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 247, if under all the circumstances coercion is not implicit in the questioning.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C. J. Camp, Inc.

    216 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 15064. October 29, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Ruth V. Reel, Arnold Ordman, Attorneys N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Snow Martin, Lakeland, Fla., William F. Howe, Jerome Powell, Washington, D.C., Bryant Martin, Lakeland, Fla., Gall Lane Howe, Washington, D.C., Gall, Lane and Howe, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc.

    264 F.2d 829 (10th Cir. 1959)   Cited 8 times

    No. 5944. March 6, 1959. Rehearing Denied April 9, 1959. Francis Sperandeo, Washington, D.C., (Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallett-Prevost, Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C., Donald R. Klenk, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. R.J. Woolsey and A. Langley Coffey, Tulsa, Okla. (Farmer, Woolsey, Flippo Bailey, Coffey Coffey, Tulsa, Okla., on the brief), for respondent. Before HUXMAN, MURRAH and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional enforcement

  10. National Lab. R. Bd. v. E. Mass. St. Ry. Co.

    235 F.2d 700 (1st Cir. 1956)   Cited 10 times
    Noting the development by the Board of a section 10(c) "for cause" body of case law