§

Midwest Television, Inc.

144 N.L.R.B. 972 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Midwest Television, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Joclin Manufacturing Company

    314 F.2d 627 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. Joclin Mfg. Co., 314 F.2d 627, 631-32 (2 Cir. 1963), we recognized that the Board's discretion in determining whether or not to hold a hearing was not unfettered, but we held that it could condition the right to a hearing on the existence of substantial and material issues: "[This] requirement [is] not only proper but necessary to prevent dilatory tactics by employers or unions disappointed in the election returns."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sidran

    181 F.2d 671 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 30 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Sidran, 181 F.2d 671 (C.A. 5), cited by respondent, the Court could only have held that the Board erred in denying a hearing if "substantial and material factual issues" were raised.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Huntsville Mfg. Co.

    203 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Huntsville Mfg. Co., 203 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1953), this court articulated a standard of "reasonableness which courts may exact of the board in the exercise of the discretion accorded it in determining `whether or not the election should be set aside for irregularities in procedure.'"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Saxe-Glassman Shoe

    201 F.2d 238 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times

    No. 4658. January 12, 1953. Rehearing Denied February 17, 1953. Sidney A. Coven, Boston, Mass. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Elizabeth W. Weston and Nancy M. Sherman, of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Maurice Epstein, Boston, Mass. (Benjamin E. Gordon and Gordon Epstein, Boston, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. W. Texas Utilities

    214 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times
    In NLRB v. West Texas Utilities Co., 214 F.2d 732 (5th Cir. 1954), there was substantial evidence, presented in a number of affidavits, that Board agents had engaged in improper conduct affecting the election results.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Carlton Wood Prod

    201 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1953)   Cited 14 times
    Signing consent agreement waives hearing on voter eligibility challenge

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Standard Transformer

    202 F.2d 846 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 7 times

    No. 11647. March 31, 1953. Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Elizabeth W. Weston and Irving M. Herman, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Eugene Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio (Stanley, Smoyer Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio (Eugene B. Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio), Hoppe, Day Ford, Warren, Ohio (John Q.T. Ford, Warren, Ohio), for respondent. Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges. MILLER, Circuit Judge. The National