§

Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

151 N.L.R.B. 1701 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Nabors v. N.L.R.B

    323 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 59 times
    Holding that NLRB acts in public capacity and “[t]he fact that these proceedings operate to confer an incidental benefit on private persons does not detract from this public purpose”

  3. Worden v. Union Gas System

    182 Kan. 686 (Kan. 1958)   Cited 27 times
    In Worden v. Union Gas System, Inc., 182 Kan. 686, 324 P.2d 501 (1958), the court held that a plaintiff was entitled to use res ipsa loquitur against a contractor defendant who engaged in excavation near a gas transmission line, and against the defendant company that owned and operated the gas transmission line.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Houston Maritime Association

    337 F.2d 333 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 7 times

    No. 20552. September 29, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert Eikel, Houston, Tex., for Houston Maritime Ass'n., Inc., and Master Stevedores Ass'n. of Texas. Chris Dixie, Dixie Schulman, Marion C. Ladwig, James P. Wolf, Houston, Tex., for Local 1273. Before HUTCHESON and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and GROOMS, District Judge

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Citizens Hotel Company

    313 F.2d 708 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 6 times
    Instructing employee to engage in surveillance of union meeting

  6. White Sulphur Springs Company v. N.L.R.B

    316 F.2d 410 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 2 times

    No. 16966. Argued September 13, 1962. Decided March 7, 1963. Mr. Paul S. Hudgins, Bluefield, W. Va., with whom Mr. Edward A. Martin, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Glen M. Bendixsen, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., were on the