§

Merrill Transport Co.

141 N.L.R.B. 1089 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Merrill Transport Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  3. Indiana Metal Products v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    202 F.2d 613 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 48 times

    No. 10717. March 10, 1953. Edward J. Fahy and Shultz Fahy, Rockford, Ill., for petitioner. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Atty. National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel and Ruth V. Reel, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. DUFFY, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the Indiana Metal Products Corporation

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sharples Chemicals

    209 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 44 times
    In NLRB v. Sharples Chemicals, Inc., 209 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1954), the respondent had submitted 53 proposed findings to the NLRB. Of such findings 20 were accepted by the Board and remainder rejected.

  5. Coppus Engineering Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    240 F.2d 564 (1st Cir. 1957)   Cited 25 times
    In Coppus we adopted the requirement of actual evidence of domination of Chicago Rawhide Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 221 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1955), and found none. Chief Judge Magruder, in a concurring opinion, recognized fully that the Shop Committee may have been "a feeble instrument", 240 F.2d at 573, but that it was "not the duty of the employer nor a function of the Board to `baby' along the employees in the direction of choosing an outside union."

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thompson Ramo Wooldridge, Inc.

    305 F.2d 807 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    Refusing to enforce an order that prohibited violations of the statute "in any other manner"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Adhesive Products Corporation

    281 F.2d 89 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 10 times
    In NLRB v. Adhesive Products Corp., 281 F.2d 89 (2nd Cir. 1960), the employer, Adhesive, had a bargaining relationship with the union, Adco, for several years.

  8. McClain v. Church

    236 P.2d 44 (Ariz. 1951)   Cited 17 times

    No. 5429. October 1, 1951. Appeal from the Superior Court of Maricopa County, Charles C. Bernstein, J. Robert Price, of Phoenix, for appellant. D. Kelly Turner, of Phoenix, for appellee. UDALL, Chief Justice. The question presented by this appeal is whether under the provisions of the Employment Security Act of Arizona, Ch. 124, 1941 Session Laws is the governing statute, real estate salesmen are employees of the real estate broker under whom they are licensed to operate. This action was brought

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Standard Coil Products Co.

    224 F.2d 465 (1st Cir. 1955)   Cited 10 times

    No. 4920. July 15, 1955. Ruth V. Reel, Washington, D.C., with whom David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., Atty., were on brief, for petitioner. Stanley Geller, New York City, with whom Arthur Richenthal, New York City, was on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board seeking enforcement

  10. Schultz v. N.L.R.B

    284 F.2d 254 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 5 times
    In Schultz v. National Labor Relations Bd., 284 F.2d 254 (D.C. Cir. 1960), the court discussed the legislative history of 29 U.S.C. § 152(5), opining that the decision of Congress to omit the word "individual" from the definition of "labor organization" indicated a clear intention to exclude the individual from this broad definition altogether.