Meadow Valley Lumber Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsMay 27, 194132 N.L.R.B. 115 (N.L.R.B. 1941) Copy Citation In the Matter Of MEADOW VALLEY LUMBER COMPANY and LUMBER AND SAWMILL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL #2626 Case No. B-2472.-Decided May 27,1911 Jurisdiction : lumber manufacturing industry. Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question : re- fusal to accord union recognition until it is certified by the Board ; election ordered to be held when the Regional Director finds Company has resumed normal operations. Unit Appropriate for Collective-Bargaining : production employees of the Com- pany at its sawmill, excluding supervisory and clerical employees and construction workers. Mr. Ray C. Smith, of Twain, Calif., for the Company. Mr. Charles J. Janigian, of San Francisco, Calif. and Mr. D. R. Streeter, of Quincy, Calif., for the L. & S. W. Mr. Howard Dyer and Mr. Harold Arrasmith, of Susanville, Calif., for the I. W. A. Mr. William T. Little, of counsel to the Board DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION STATEMENT OF THE CASE On October 19, 1940, Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union, No. 2626, herein called the L. & S. W., filed with the Regional Director for the Twentieth Region (San Francisco, California) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Meadow Valley Lumber Company, Meadow Valley, California, herein called the Company, and request- ing an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On January 24, 1941, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Rela- tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On 32 N. L. R. B., No. 21. 445692-42-vol. 32--9 115 116 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD March 6, 1941, the Acting Regional Director issued a notice of hear- ing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company, the L. & S. W., and International Woodworkers of America, Local No. 6-215, and California State Industrial Union Council, labor organizations claiming to represent employees directly affected by the investigation. Pursuant to notice, a hearing was held on April 14, 1941, at Quincy, California, before Paul Jennings, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. At the hearing, International Wood- workers of America, Local 6-234, affiliated with the C. I. 0., herein called the I. W. A., appeared and intervened in the proceeding. The Company, the L. & S. W., and the I. W. A. were represented by counsel or official representatives, and all participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded all parties. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made several rulings on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. On May 2, 1941, the L. & S. W. submitted a brief which has been duly considered by the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Meadow Valley Lumber Company, a California corporation having its principal office and place of business in Oakland, California, is engaged in the, manufacture of lumber at Spanish Ranch and Grey's Flat, California. Of the 20,245,701 board feet of lumber cut at the Company's sawmill between January 1 and November 20, 1940, ap- proximately 4,761,000 board feet, or about 24 per cent, were shipped to points outside the State of California; 5,906,000 board feet, or about 29 per cent, were shipped to points within the State of Cali- fornia; and approximately 9,578,701 board feet, or about 47 per cent, remained unsold at the time of the hearing. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Lumber and Sawmill Workers Union, Local No. 2626, is a labor organization chartered by the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, and affiliated with the American Federation of Labor. It admits to membership employees of the Company. MEADOW VALLEY LUMBER COMPANY 117 International Woodworkers of America, Local 6-234, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organization,, admitting to membership employees of the Company. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION In September 1940, the L. & S. W. requested recognition as the exclusive bargaining agent of the employees of the Company's saw- mill. The Company replied that it would not recognize the L. & S. W. as the exclusive representative of the sawmill employees until the L. & S. W. was certified by the Board. A statement prepared by the Acting Regional Director and intro- duced in evidence at the hearing, shows that the L. & S. W. and the I. W. A. represent a substantial number of employees 1 in the unit found below to be appropriate. We find that a question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company. IV. THE EFFECT OF THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION UPON COMMERCE We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen, occurring in connection with the operations of the Company described in Section I above, has a close, intimate, and substantial relation to trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States and tends to lead to labor disputes burdening and obstructing commerce and the free flow of commerce. V. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Company's business is comprised of (1) a sawmill and (2) a yard and planing mill. At the Company's sawmill at Meadow Valley,2 logs are cut into rough green lumber. The lumber is then transported to the Company's yard and planing mill at Grey's Flat, approximately 25 miles distant,3 where it is piled, seasoned, and manufactured into the finished product. The L. & S. W. claims that the production employees of the sawmill, excluding the employees of the yard and planing mill, constitute an appropriate unit. The I. W. A. claims that all the employees of the Company, including 1 The report of the Acting Regional Director shows that 43 of the 63 employees on the October 15 , 1940, sawmill pay roll , signed application cards for the L & S W. and 11 signed application cards for the I. W. A. 2 Throughout the hearing the names Spanish Ranch and Meado w Valley were used inter- changeably to designate the locatlon•of the sawmill 3 At the time of the hearing the Company was constiucting a new yard and planing mill about 8 miles from the sawmill . When the new yard and planing mill is completed, the present one w ill be abandoned. 118 bECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD those of the yard and planing mill, constitute a single appropriate unit. The Company takes no position as to the appropriateness of the unit. On February 1, 1940, the Company and the I. W. A. negotiated a closed-shop contract for the employees of the yard and planing mill. During the summer of 1940 both the L. & S. W. and the I. W. A. sought to organize the employees of the sawmill. On March 30, 1941, the contract with the I. W. A. expired. Thereafter, however, the Company and the I. W. A. officials tentatively agreed upon a new contract subject to the approval of the international union. Mean- while it was agreed that the closed-shop provisions of the original contract remain in force. As noted above, the closed-shop contract between the I. W. A. and the Company did not cover employees of the sawmill. From the foregoing we are of the opinion that at the present time a unit consisting of all the employees of the Company, as urged by the I. W. A., is not appropriate. The I. W. A. has confined its bargaining relations with the Company to the employees of the yard and planing mill. It is apparent, moreover, from its express desire not to participate in an election confined to employees of the sawmill 4 and from its membership showing among such employees, that the I. W. A. does not claim to represent a majority of the sawmill em- ployees. On the other hand, the L. & S. W. has confined its organi- zation activity to the sawmill employees. Under all the circum- stances we believe that the unit requested by the L. & S. W. is appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining. The Company presently employs a number of construction workers who are engaged in building the Company's new yard and planing mill. The L. & S. W. desires that these construction workers and the Company's supervisory and clerical employees be excluded from the unit of sawmill employees.5 The Company did not object to the exclusion of these employees and we shall exclude them from the unit. We find that all production employees of the Company at its saw- mill, excluding supervisory and clerical employees and construction workers, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, and that said unit will insure to employees of the Com- pany the full benefit of their; right to self-organization and to collective bargaining and otherwise effectuate the policies of the Act. 4 See Section VI, infra. 5 V. R. Christy, the sawmill superintendent , and J H. Knight, the night foreman of the sawmill, as supervisory employees , and 0. E. Burton, Lester Fay, James E. Pullen, Rex Morehouse, Ray C. Smith , and Elmer Wolfe, as clerical employees MEADOW VALLEY LUMBER COMPANY 119 VI. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by means of an election by secret ballot. The I. W. A. stated at the hearing that it did not desire to participate in the election if the Board found that the sawmill employees con- stituted an appropriate unit. We shall accordingly exclude the I. W. A. from the ballot. The L. & S. W. requested that the election should not be held until the sawmill resumes full operations on both day and night shifts. The L. & S. W. also requested that eligibility to participate in the election should be determined by the pay roll next preceding the date of the election. The Company did not object to either request of the L. & S. W. At the time of the hearing, the sawmill had been closed since November 1940. The Company stated that it intended to com- mence operations within a short time after the hearing. The record is not clear, however, as to when the sawmill will resume full opera- tions. We shall accordingly direct that the election shall be held as soon as practicable under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Twentieth Region, who shall determine in his dis- cretion the time such election shall be conducted to the end that such election shall be held when the Company is engaged in normal operations. We shall further direct that employees eligible to vote in the election shall be those employees in the appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the election, subject to such limitations and additions as are set forth in the Direction of Election herein. Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. A question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the repre- sentation of employees of Meadow Valley Lumber Company, Meadow Valley, California, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. All production employees of the Company at its sawmill, exclud- ing supervisory and clerical employees and construction workers, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Rela- 120 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD tions Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that , as part of the investigation authorized by the Board to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Meadow Valley Lumber Company, Meadow Valley, California, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted at such time as the Regional Director for the Twentieth Region shall determine pursuant to the provisions of Section VI of the Decision herein, under the direction and supervision of said Regional Director , acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations , among the production employees of Meadow Valley Lumber Company , Meadow Valley, California , at its sawmill , employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of the election , including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States , or temporarily laid off, but excluding supervisory and clerical employees , construction workers, and those who have since quit or been discharged for cause , to determine whether or not they desire to be represented for the purposes of collective bargaining by Lumber and Sawmill Workers , A. F. of L., Local Union 2626. MR. EDWIN S. SMITH , dissenting : For the reasons stated in Matter of Lewis Lumber Company and International Woodworkers of America, Local Union No. 257, afli- ated with the C. I. 0.,6 I would find a single unit consisting of the sawmill and the yard and planing mill employees. °31 N L R B 688 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation