§

Mayer / Berkshire Corp. v. Noe-Equl Hosiery Corp.

No. 91100060 (T.T.A.B. Apr. 6, 1999)
Mayer / Berkshire Corp. v. Noe-Equl Hosiery Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.

    476 F.2d 1357 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 190 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Reciting thirteen factors to be considered, referred to as "DuPont factors"

  2. Specialty Brands v. Coffee Bean Distributors

    748 F.2d 669 (Fed. Cir. 1984)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that "[w]hen an opposer's trademark is a strong, famous mark, it can never be of little consequence" in a likelihood-of-confusion analysis

  3. In re Hyper Shoppes (Ohio), Inc.

    837 F.2d 463 (Fed. Cir. 1988)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding similarity between furniture and "general merchandise store services," and rejecting the distinction between goods and services as having "little or no legal significance"

  4. King Candy Co. v. Eunice King's Kitchen

    496 F.2d 1400 (C.C.P.A. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    Patent Appeal No. 9245. June 6, 1974. J. Timothy Hobbs, Washington, D.C. (Mason, Fenwick Lawrence, Washington, D.C.), attorney of record, for appellant. William B. Mason, Arlington, Va. (Mason, Mason Albright, Arlington, Va.), attorney of record, for appellee. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Judges. MARKEY, Chief Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, 178 USPQ 121 (1973)

  5. Crown Radio Corp. v. Soundscriber Corp.

    506 F.2d 1392 (C.C.P.A. 1974)   Cited 3 times

    Patent Appeal No. 74-584. December 26, 1974. Edward M. Prince, Washington, D.C. (Cushman, Darby Cushman, Washington, D.C.), attorney of record, for appellant. John E. Benoit, Arlington, Va., attorney of record, for appellee. Robert H. Ware and F. Eugene Davis IV, Bridgeport, Conn. (Mattern, Ware Davis, Bridgeport, Conn.), of counsel. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, BALDWIN, LANE and MILLER, Associate Judges. LANE, Judge. This is an appeal from