§
Matter of D-I-M

7 Cited authorities

  1. Niang v. Gonzales

    422 F.3d 1187 (10th Cir. 2005)   Cited 114 times
    Holding that "FGM constitutes persecution, whether for the purpose of determining past persecution or the purpose of determining well-founded fear of persecution"

  2. Hang Kannha Yuk v. Ashcroft

    355 F.3d 1222 (10th Cir. 2004)   Cited 102 times
    Concluding that unfulfilled threats are properly considered in determining whether an alien has a reasonable fear of future persecution, but passage of time since the threat was received diminishes its present significance

  3. Tulengkey v. Gonzales

    425 F.3d 1277 (10th Cir. 2005)   Cited 94 times
    Holding that fear of persecution is not well-founded if the applicant can avoid persecution by relocating to another part of the country, and it would be reasonable to expect him to do so

  4. Krastev v. I.N.S.

    292 F.3d 1268 (10th Cir. 2002)   Cited 91 times
    Explaining that applicant may establish eligibility for a "humanitarian" grant of asylum, "even when no future danger of persecution exists"

  5. Section 1101 - Definitions

    8 U.S.C. § 1101   Cited 16,720 times   91 Legal Analyses
    Finding notice and comment rulemaking is required for the agency's interim rule recognizing fear of coercive family practices as basis for refugee status

  6. Section 1158 - Asylum

    8 U.S.C. § 1158   Cited 10,675 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "pattern or practice" of persecution requires it be "systemic, pervasive, or organized"

  7. Section 1229a - Removal proceedings

    8 U.S.C. § 1229a   Cited 6,401 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Granting a noncitizen the right to file one motion to reopen and providing that “the motion to reopen shall be filed within 90 days of the date of entry of a final administrative order of removal”