§

Masonic Temple Association of Detroit and 450 Temple, Inc., a Single Employer

364 NLRB No. 150 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Masonic Temple Association of Detroit and 450 Temple, Inc., a Single Employer

9 Cited authorities

  1. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  3. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  4. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  5. Peoples Gas System, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    629 F.2d 35 (D.C. Cir. 1980)   Cited 64 times
    In Peoples Gas, the court recognized, for the first time, the Board's obligation to provide a reasoned explanation for ordering an affirmative bargaining order: "A remedial order should recognize the competing considerations which are potentially affected by the remedy chosen, be grounded in factual determinations rather than speculation, and explain how, in light of present circumstances its remedy can be expected to effectuate the purposes of the Act."Id. at 45 (footnote omitted).

  6. Pacific Coast Supply, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    801 F.3d 321 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14–1047 14–1081. 2015-09-18 PACIFIC COAST SUPPLY, LLC, Doing Business as Anderson Lumber Company, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Stephen Thomas Davenport Jr. argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Valerie L. Collins, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr

  7. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  8. McDonald Partners, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.3d 1002 (D.C. Cir. 2003)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that there must be a showing of "changed circumstances or new evidence calling the reliability of the old evidence into doubt."

  9. Scepter, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    280 F.3d 1053 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 8 times
    Noting that because the party "failed to raise a particularized challenge to the bargaining order before the Board, this court has no authority to address the issue"