§

Mark I Tune-Up Centers, Inc.

256 N.L.R.B. 898 (N.L.R.B. 1981)
Mark I Tune-Up Centers, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  4. Legille v. Dann

    544 F.2d 1 (D.C. Cir. 1976)   Cited 80 times
    Holding that a registered agent's testimony denying receipt overcame the presumption

  5. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  6. Sturgis Newport Bus. Forms, v. N.L.R.B

    563 F.2d 1252 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 31 times
    Finding that an employee's evasive answers to questions raises the inference that they feared reprisal

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Cement Transport, Inc.

    490 F.2d 1024 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 35 times

    No. 73-1260. Argued October 17, 1973. Decided January 22, 1974. Rehearing Denied March 4, 1974. Lawrence Levien, N.L.R.B., for petitioner; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Assistant Gen. Counsel, Alan D. Cirker, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Louis E. Woolery, Louisville, Ky., for respondent; James U. Smith, Jr., Louisville, Ky., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and O'SULLIVAN

  8. Cagle's, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    588 F.2d 943 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times
    Holding employer responsible for actions of local chamber of commerce official who campaigned against union and acted as de facto intermediary between union committee and employer

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Sinclair Company

    397 F.2d 157 (1st Cir. 1968)   Cited 28 times
    In NLRB v. Sinclair Co., 397 F.2d 157, 161 (1st Cir. 1968), one of the three consolidated cases disposed of in the Gissel opinion, the Court of Appeals said, "Whether an employer has used language that is coercive in its effect is a question essentially for the specialized experience of the Board."

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Jamaica Towing, Inc.

    602 F.2d 1100 (2d Cir. 1979)   Cited 12 times

    No. 1214, Docket 79-4049. Argued June 14, 1979. Decided July 24, 1979. Corinna Metcalf, Washington, D.C. (John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C.), for petitioner. Carl A. Schwarz, Jr., New York City (Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine Underberg, Raymond L. Vandenberg,