§

Marchese Metal Industries

313 N.L.R.B. 1022 (N.L.R.B. 1994)
Marchese Metal Industries

17 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  4. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 535 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants

    489 U.S. 426 (1989)   Cited 114 times
    Noting that, "[f]rom the time of our very first opportunity to interpret the 1934 amendments, we have viewed them as addressing primarily the precertification rights and freedoms of unorganized employees"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Augusta Bakery Corp.

    957 F.2d 1467 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that the replacements were temporary because, although the replacements were told that "if they worked out and did their job, they had a job," the testimony of the replacements indicated that they did not understand themselves to be permanent employees

  7. N.L.R.B. v. New England Lithographic Co.

    589 F.2d 29 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 20 times

    No. 78-1122. Argued September 12, 1978. Decided December 14, 1978. Corina Metcalf, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John H. Ferguson and Elizabeth Bunn, Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Carol Chandler, Boston, Mass., with whom Robert Chandler, and Stoneman, Chandler Miller, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent

  8. Metromedia, Inc., KMBC-TV v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    586 F.2d 1182 (8th Cir. 1978)   Cited 20 times

    Nos. 77-1974, 78-1145. Submitted June 14, 1978. Decided October 12, 1978. Rehearing Denied in No. 77-1974, November 24, 1978. James R. Willard of Spencer, Fane, Britt Browne, Kansas City, Mo., argued, for petitioner, Metromedia, Inc.; Willard and Michael F. Delaney, Kansas City, Mo., and Paul Kuelthau of Moller, Talent, Kuelthau, Dowell Fisher, St. Louis, Mo., filed brief. William A. Jolley of Jolley, Moran, Walsh, Hager Gordon, Kansas City, Mo., argued and filed brief for petitioner-intervenor,

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Rockwood Co.

    834 F.2d 837 (9th Cir. 1987)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that economic striker was "entitled to reinstatement to his former position, to one substantially equivalent, or to one for which he was qualified"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Hayden Elec., Inc.

    693 F.2d 1358 (11th Cir. 1982)   Cited 11 times
    Finding termination of letter of assent effective where an employer wrote "to advise, 150 days in advance, of [the company's] intention to exercise [its] option to cancel [its] contract with local union"

  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,211 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”