ยง

Manuela Manufacturing Co., Inc.

143 N.L.R.B. 379 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Manuela Manufacturing Co., Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Mitsubishi Motors v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth

    814 F.2d 844 (1st Cir. 1987)   Cited 24 times
    Affirming decision lifting stay without hearing when the court reviewed briefing by both parties and the debtor did not show "viable reasons for maintaining the stay"

  2. Chicago Rawhide Mfg. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    221 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 31 times
    In Chicago Rawhide, this Court concluded that: "[n]either mere cooperation, preference, nor possibility of control constitute unfair labor practices; and the Board may not infer conduct that is violative of the Act from conduct that is not, unless there is a substantial basis, in fact or reason, for that inference."

  3. Coppus Engineering Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    240 F.2d 564 (1st Cir. 1957)   Cited 25 times
    In Coppus we adopted the requirement of actual evidence of domination of Chicago Rawhide Mfg. Co. v. NLRB, 221 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1955), and found none. Chief Judge Magruder, in a concurring opinion, recognized fully that the Shop Committee may have been "a feeble instrument", 240 F.2d at 573, but that it was "not the duty of the employer nor a function of the Board to `baby' along the employees in the direction of choosing an outside union."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Thompson Ramo Wooldridge, Inc.

    305 F.2d 807 (7th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times
    Refusing to enforce an order that prohibited violations of the statute "in any other manner"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Mt. Clemens Metal Products Company

    287 F.2d 790 (6th Cir. 1961)   Cited 10 times

    No. 14263. March 21, 1961. Richard H. Frank, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Desenberg, Detroit, Mich. (Moll, Desenberg, Purdy Glover, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for respondent. Before MILLER, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge, and THORNTON, District Judge. SHACKELFORD MILLER, JR., Chief Judge

  6. Schultz v. N.L.R.B

    284 F.2d 254 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 5 times
    In Schultz v. National Labor Relations Bd., 284 F.2d 254 (D.C. Cir. 1960), the court discussed the legislative history of 29 U.S.C. ยง 152(5), opining that the decision of Congress to omit the word "individual" from the definition of "labor organization" indicated a clear intention to exclude the individual from this broad definition altogether.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Associated Machines

    219 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 8 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Associated Machines, 219 F.2d 433 (6th Cir. 1955), this court refused to enforce a Board order against an employer that had formed an employee committee with elected representatives that discussed with management "production problems, plant efficiency... and other problems of mutual interest."

  8. N.L.R.B. v. the Summers Fertilizer

    251 F.2d 514 (1st Cir. 1958)   Cited 5 times

    No. 5253. Heard November 6, 1957. Decided January 14, 1958. Robert J. Wilson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Herbert H. Bennett, Portland, Me., with whom Mayo S. Levenson, Portland, Me., was on the brief, for respondents. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Holland Mfg. Co.

    292 F.2d 840 (3d Cir. 1961)

    No. 13519. Argued June 6, 1961. Decided July 31, 1961. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. No appearance for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board

  10. Bonnaz, Hand Embroiderers, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    230 F.2d 47 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 3 times

    No. 12672. Argued January 3, 1956. Decided February 9, 1956. Mr. Morris P. Glushien, New York City, for petitioners. Messrs. Bernard Dunau and Samuel H. Jaffee, Washington, D.C., also entered appearances for petitioners. Mr. Norton J. Come, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Floyd F. Toomey, Washington, D