§
Lummus Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89 v. Riss & Co.

    372 U.S. 517 (1963)   Cited 247 times
    Holding that the LMRA permits federal district courts to enforce “final and binding” arbitration awards issued pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement

  2. Teamsters Local v. Labor Board

    365 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 174 times
    Holding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria

  3. Morrison-Knudsen Company v. N.L.R.B

    275 F.2d 914 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 24 times
    In Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 2 Cir., 275 F.2d 914, the court did not consider the Mountain Pacific doctrine, since the Board had also found that the agreement involved "actually imposed discriminatory conditions of referral.

  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Int'l Union

    194 F.2d 698 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 31 times
    Ignoring of prior action before a Wisconsin state agency

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. George D. Auchter

    209 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 21 times

    No. 14537. January 15, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, General Counsel, Dean E. Denlinger, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Edwin C. Coffee, Harry G. Kincaid, Jacksonville, Fla., Knight, Walrath, Kincaid Young, Jacksonville, Fla., Coffee Coffee, Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent Carpenters Dist. Council of Jacksonville and Vicinity. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Cement Masons

    225 F.2d 168 (9th Cir. 1955)   Cited 18 times

    No. 14238. June 30, 1955. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Robert J. Wiener, Frederick U. Reel, Myron S. Waks, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Green, Richardson, Green Griswold, Donald S. Richardson, Portland, Or., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, POPE, and FEE, Circuit Judges. STEPHENS, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board brought under Section

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. F.H. McGraw Co.

    206 F.2d 635 (6th Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times

    No. 11778. June 4, 1953. Petitions for Modification and Rehearing Denied July 7, 1953. Joseph Lotterman, New York City, for respondents. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Dean E. Denlinger, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Wheeler Marshall, Paducah, Ky., and Lotterman Tepper, New York City, on brief; James G. Wheeler, Paducah, Ky., Ralph R. Weiser, New York City, of counsel, for

  8. Del E. Webb Const. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    196 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1952)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 14428, 14446. May 6, 1952. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Mark C. Curran, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for National Labor Relations Board. Charles B. Blackmar, Kansas City, Mo. (Henry I. Eager, and Blackmar, Newkirk, Eager, Swanson Midgley, all of Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for Del E. Webb Const. Co. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo. (Clif. Langsdale

  9. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. INT'L UNION, ETC

    237 F.2d 670 (9th Cir. 1956)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15003. October 9, 1956. Rehearing Denied December 4, 1956. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David Sokol, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before STEPHENS, ORR, and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the Board, petitions this court to enforce its order against the International