§
LP Enteprises

13 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,558 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  2. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  3. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  4. Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

    383 U.S. 53 (1966)   Cited 732 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

  5. Belknap, Inc. v. Hale

    463 U.S. 491 (1983)   Cited 277 times
    Holding that the NLRA does not preempt state law contract actions by replacement workers to enforce terms of an employment contract

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nash-Finch Co.

    404 U.S. 138 (1971)   Cited 163 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that board's attempt to "enjoin" or "restrain" state court injunction fell within exception of 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which forbids court from granting "an injunction to stay" such proceedings unless otherwise authorized

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fant Milling Co.

    360 U.S. 301 (1959)   Cited 106 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an untimely allegation of an unlawful unilateral wage increase was sufficiently related to a timely refusal-to-bargain charge, because the wage increase "largely influenced" the Board's finding that an unlawful refusal to bargain had occurred

  8. Windfield v. Groen Div., Dover Corp.

    890 F.2d 764 (5th Cir. 1989)   Cited 24 times
    Finding no Garmon preemption of fraud claim arising from employer's promise of job security to a union organizer employee

  9. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local 776 Affiliated with International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    973 F.2d 230 (3d Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Affirming the Board's imposition of attorney's fees from the time at which the arbitration became unlawful

  10. Willmar Elec. Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    968 F.2d 1327 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that paid union organizers are employees within the meaning of the Act, but noting that "we are ready to assume arguendo that Willmar made out so powerful a case of likely disloyalty that the Board would have had to conclude that rejection of Hendrix's application on that ground would have been legitimate and not in violation of the anti-discrimination and anti-coercion provisions of the Act."