13 Cited authorities
Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
414 U.S. 168 (1973) Cited 497 times 20 Legal AnalysesHolding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.
406 U.S. 272 (1972) Cited 478 times 49 Legal AnalysesHolding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement
Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO
417 U.S. 249 (1974) Cited 366 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees
Teamsters Local v. Labor Board
365 U.S. 667 (1961) Cited 174 timesHolding that the Board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt, not that the Board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria
Labor Board v. Atkins Co.
331 U.S. 398 (1947) Cited 79 timesHolding that employer-employee relationship is determined by power to set wages and hours, coupled with the financial burden of the wages and receipt of the benefits of the work, as well as the absolute power to hire and fire or the power to control all the activities of the worker
Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers U. v. N.L.R.B
463 F.2d 907 (D.C. Cir. 1972) Cited 60 timesIn Ladies' Garment Workers, the Second Circuit stated that "no genuine bargaining... can be conducted where the decision has already been made and implemented."
Federal-Mogul Corp. v. N.L.R.B
566 F.2d 1245 (5th Cir. 1978) Cited 40 timesFinding isolated statements made by low-echelon foremen and supervisors who were friends of the employees non-coercive where statements were made in friendly conversations
N.L.R.B. v. Western Wirebound Box Co.
356 F.2d 88 (9th Cir. 1966) Cited 19 timesAnalyzing ALJ decision in light of Truitt cautionary language
Hambre Hombre Enterprises, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
581 F.2d 204 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 6 timesNo. 77-1613. July 12, 1978. Rehearing Denied September 5, 1978. Ralph M. Segura, Walnut Creek, Cal., for petitioner. Paul J. Spielberg (argued), Elliott Moore, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition to Review Final Order of the National Labor Relations Board and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before SNEED and TANG, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge. Honorable William H. Orrick, United States District Judge for the Northern District
N.L.R.B. v. Transcontinental Theaters, Inc.
568 F.2d 125 (9th Cir. 1978) Cited 6 timesNo. 75-2505. September 27, 1977. As Amended January 12, 1978. Michael D. Stein, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner. George King, of Boornazian, King Schulze, Oakland, Cal., argued, for respondent. Michael B. Roger, Levy, VanBourg Hackler, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for intervenor International Assoc. of Theatrical Stage Employees. Before BROWNING and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge. Honorable E. Avery Crary, Senior United States District Judge, Central District
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"