§

Los Santos, LLC v. Johnny D. Gabriel and Rosalie Gabriel

91223574 (T.T.A.B. Jun. 10, 2019)
Los Santos, LLC v. Johnny D. Gabriel and Rosalie Gabriel

9 Cited authorities

  1. Aktieselskabet AF 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.

    525 F.3d 8 (D.C. Cir. 2008)   Cited 393 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, in a cancellation proceeding, "an intent-to-use applicant prevails over any opposer who began using a similar mark after the intent-to-use filing date"

  2. Imperial Tobacco v. Philip Morris, Inc.

    899 F.2d 1575 (Fed. Cir. 1990)   Cited 82 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Finding that promotional use of a mark on “incidental products” like whiskey, pens, watches, sunglasses, and food did not constitute use of mark for cigarettes

  3. Exxon Corp. v. Humble Exploration Co., Inc.

    695 F.2d 96 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 75 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that limited sales of preexisting “Humble” branded oil with an explanation that these customers were receiving Exxon products were not sufficient to constitute “use” to avoid abandonment

  4. M.Z. Berger & Co. v. Swatch AG

    787 F.3d 1368 (Fed. Cir. 2015)   Cited 12 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Noting that while an application may be made for registration based on a bona fide intent to use the mark in commerce, actual commercial use must be shown before registration

  5. Del Tabaco v. Gen. Cigar Co.

    753 F.3d 1270 (Fed. Cir. 2014)   Cited 12 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that appellant demonstrated entitlement to a "statutory cause of action" under the Lanham Act

  6. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,778 times   123 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  7. Section 1127 - Construction and definitions; intent of chapter

    15 U.S.C. § 1127   Cited 2,940 times   95 Legal Analyses
    Granting standing under § 1114 to the legal representative of the registrant of a trademark

  8. Section 2.122 - Matters in evidence

    37 C.F.R. § 2.122   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Providing that in inter partes proceeding, "[t]he allegation in an application for registration, or in a registration, of a date of use is not evidence on behalf of the applicant or registrant" but, rather, "a date of use of a mark must be established by competent evidence"

  9. Section 2.120 - Discovery

    37 C.F.R. § 2.120   Cited 21 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that the TTAB "in its discretion, may refuse to consider the additional written disclosures or responses"