§

Lorita A.,1 Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

0120132651 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 15, 2015)
Lorita A.,1 Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc.

    530 U.S. 133 (2000)   Cited 21,534 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "trier of fact can reasonably infer from the falsity of the explanation that the employer is dissembling to cover up a discriminatory purpose"

  2. Furnco Construction Corp. v. Waters

    438 U.S. 567 (1978)   Cited 2,180 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a district court was "entitled to consider the racial mix of the work force when trying to make the determination as to motivation" in the employment discrimination context

  3. Ash v. Tyson Foods

    546 U.S. 454 (2006)   Cited 709 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that decisionmaker’s alleged use of term "boy" to refer to African-American employees was evidence of discriminatory animus

  4. Cooper v. Southern Co.

    390 F.3d 695 (11th Cir. 2004)   Cited 887 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employee's conclusory testimony based on her subjective belief could not preclude summary judgment against her

  5. Bauer v. Bailar

    647 F.2d 1037 (10th Cir. 1981)   Cited 81 times
    Holding employer's subjective hiring criteria to be nonpretextual where the subjective factors considered were articulated and generally relevant to the job