§

Loomis Armored US, Inc.

364 NLRB No. 23 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Loomis Armored US, Inc.

19 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,210 times   616 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Chrysler Corp. v. Brown

    441 U.S. 281 (1979)   Cited 1,310 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a regulation may have "the force and effect of law" if: it enacts substantive rules affecting individual rights and obligations, and is not merely an interpretive rule or general policy statement; Congress has delegated "quasi-legislative" power to the agency; and the regulation is valid, i.e., the agency has followed applicable procedures such as the Administrative Procedure Act

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  4. Holly Farms Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 392 (1996)   Cited 136 times
    Holding that where statute's meaning is obvious, courts and Board must defer to Congress's unambiguous intent, but where ambiguity exists, courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of the statute

  5. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  6. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  7. Mine Workers v. Arkansas Flooring Co.

    351 U.S. 62 (1956)   Cited 79 times
    In United Mine Workers v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co., 351 U.S. 62, 76 S.Ct. 559, 100 L. Ed. 941, references to postlegislative history were referred to in the opinion of the Court.

  8. Labor Board v. Jones Laughlin Co.

    331 U.S. 416 (1947)   Cited 88 times
    In Jones Laughlin, the employer refused to negotiate with a unit of plant guards because the guards had been sworn in as auxiliary police of the United States Army during World War II, a fact which, in the view of the employer, made it particularly inappropriate to allow them to unionize.

  9. Colgate Co. v. Labor Board

    338 U.S. 355 (1949)   Cited 36 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued November 17, 1949. Decided December 5, 1949. An employer and a labor organization entered into a closed-shop agreement which was valid under the National Labor Relations Act and under state law. The agreement, which the employer had entered into in good faith, was of indefinite duration and had been in effect more than four years. Pursuant to the agreement, upon the demand of the labor organization and in good

  10. General Serv. Employees, Local 73 v. N.L.R.B

    230 F.3d 909 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 5 times

    No. 99-2577. Argued February 10, 2000. Decided October 16, 2000. Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge. Craig Becker (argued), Chicago, IL, for Petitioner. Elizabeth Kinney, National Labor Relations Board, Chicago, IL, Anna Francis (argued), Aileen Armstrong, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for Respondent. Jeffrey W. Pagano, King, Pagano Harrison, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae. Before FLAUM, Chief Judge, and COFFEY and DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judges. DIANE

  11. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,211 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”

  12. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,441 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it