Lockheed Shipbuilding And Construction Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Powell v. McCormack

    395 U.S. 486 (1969)   Cited 3,153 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the obviation of the petitioner's claim for injunctive relief did not render the whole case moot, when a damages claim for backpay remained
  2. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.

    345 U.S. 629 (1953)   Cited 2,263 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, although defendant had "disclaimed any intention" to revive the challenged conduct, "[s]uch a profession does not suffice to make a case moot although it is one of the factors to be considered in determining the appropriateness of granting an injunction against the now-discontinued acts"
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 184 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
  4. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
  5. Wallace Corp. v. Labor Board

    323 U.S. 248 (1944)   Cited 162 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that corporation committed unfair labor practice
  6. Labor Board v. Mexia Textile Mills

    339 U.S. 563 (1950)   Cited 132 times
    Reasoning that Board's entitlement to enforcement prevents cases from becoming moot because it "adds to existing sanctions that of punishment for contempt"
  7. Twin City Co. v. Harding Glass Co.

    283 U.S. 353 (1931)   Cited 186 times
    Holding "[t]he general rule is that competent persons shall have the utmost liberty of contracting and that their agreements voluntarily and fairly made shall be held valid and enforced in the courts"
  8. Baltimore Ohio c. Railway v. Voigt

    176 U.S. 498 (1900)   Cited 182 times
    Holding a messenger riding on train for his employer's purposes, and pursuant to a contract between his employer and the railway company, not a passenger
  9. Free-Flow Packaging Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    566 F.2d 1124 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that failure to grant a wage increase could be lawfully motivated by a good-faith effort "to comply with the requirements of law"
  10. N.L.R.B. v. McCready and Sons, Inc.

    482 F.2d 872 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 16 times

    No. 72-1320. Argued October 16, 1972. Decided June 29, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome H. Brooks, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., Robert A. Giannasi, N.L.R.B., for petitioner-appellant; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Stephen J. Solomon, Allen H. Feldman, Attys., N.L.R.B., on brief. Craig A. Miller, Kalamazoo, Mich., for respondents-appellees; Gemrich, Moser, Dombrowski, Bowser Garvey by Craig A. Miller, Kalamazoo, Mich., on brief for