§

Local Union No. 282, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

155 N.L.R.B. 973 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Local Union No. 282, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  2. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  3. Teamsters Union v. Oliver

    358 U.S. 283 (1959)   Cited 166 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Teamsters v. Oliver, 358 U.S. 283 (1959), we held that a state antitrust law could not be used to challenge an employer-union agreement. Justice White's opinion in Jewel Tea explains, however, that Oliver held only that "[a]s the agreement did not embody a `"remote and indirect approach to the subject of wages'... but a direct frontal attack upon a problem thought to threaten the maintenance of the basic wage structure established by the collective bargaining contract,' [358 U.S.], at 294, the paramount federal policy of encouraging collective bargaining proscribed application of the state law.

  4. Mitchell v. Tribune Company

    342 U.S. 919 (1952)   Cited 90 times
    Employing the "target area" approach

  5. Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    Subcontracting in cases of lack of equipment to companies employing members of same local whenever possible

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Milk Drivers Dairy Emp. L. U. 584

    341 F.2d 29 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 18 times

    No. 288, Docket 29130. Argued January 12, 1965. Decided January 26, 1965. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Linda R. Sher, Attorney, NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Bruce H. Simon, New York City (Robert S. Savelson, New York City, of counsel, and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before SMITH, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Nu-Car Carriers

    189 F.2d 756 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc., 189 F.2d 756 (3rd Cir. 1951), cert. den., 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 367, 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952), workers who leased tractors from a corporation were held to be employees, on the grounds that express contractual provisions placing the workers under the direction and supervision of the corporation were enforced by supervisors who checked up on the quality of their driving, discharged, and at times assigned routes to the workers.

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Local 294

    298 F.2d 105 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 13 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Local 294 I.B.T., 298 F.2d 105 (2nd Cir., 1961), the Court analyzed the meaning of the "employed by any person" phrase and said that the phrase does not include corporate officers, high ranking supervisors and others high up in the management heirarchy.