§

Local 575, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

141 N.L.R.B. 592 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Local 575, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Wickard v. Filburn

    317 U.S. 111 (1942)   Cited 924 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "even if appellee’s activity be local and though it may not be regarded as commerce, it may still, whatever its nature, be reached by Congress if it exerts a substantial effect on interstate commerce"

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  4. Local No. 636, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    278 F.2d 858 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 16 times

    No. 15012. Argued February 8, 1960. Decided March 31, 1960. Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Thomas X. Dunn and Patrick C. O'Donoghue, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent

  5. Fruit Vegetable Packers v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 311 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 11 times

    No. 16588. Argued January 22, 1962. Decided June 7, 1962. Petition for Rehearing Denied October 12, 1962. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., and David Leo Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost

  6. National Labor Relations Boad v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam

    285 F.2d 642 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 12 times
    In Enterprise the owner awarded to the contractor a general piping contract under which the contractor was obliged to fabricate and install such piping as the owner would provide for the project.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Local 239

    289 F.2d 41 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 10 times

    No. 271, Docket 26600. Argued February 24, 1961. Decided April 17, 1961. James C. Paras, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles R. Katz, Katz Wolchok, New York City, for respondent. Before HINCKS and MOORE, Circuit Judges, and BRENNAN, District Judge. Sitting by designation

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Local 294

    273 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    No. 42, Docket 25558. Argued December 3, 1959. Decided January 12, 1960. Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Duane B. Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harry Pozefsky, Gloversville, N.Y., for respondents. Before CLARK, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges. MOORE, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) petitions

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Holiday Hotel Management Company

    311 F.2d 380 (10th Cir. 1962)

    No. 7125. November 28, 1962. Herman Levy, Washington, D.C., (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Lee M. Modjeska, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for petitioner. Edward E. Soule of Lytle, Soule Emery, Oklahoma City, Okla., for respondent. Before PICKETT, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge. Pursuant to § 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, the